Impact of variable fluid properties on forced convection of Fe3O4/CNT/water hybrid nanofluid in a double-pipe mini-channel heat exchanger

被引:0
作者
Amin Shahsavar
Ali Godini
Pouyan Talebizadeh Sardari
Davood Toghraie
Hamzeh Salehipour
机构
[1] Kermanshah University of Technology,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[2] The University of Nottingham,Fluids and Thermal Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Engineering
[3] Khomeinishahr Branch,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[4] Islamic Azad University,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[5] Ilam University,undefined
来源
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry | 2019年 / 137卷
关键词
Non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid; Double-pipe heat exchanger; Magnetite; Carbon nanotube; Convective heat transfer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this study is to assess the hydrothermal performance of a non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid with temperature-dependent thermal conductivity and viscosity compared with a Newtonian hybrid nanofluid with constant thermophysical properties. A counter-current double-pipe mini-channel heat exchanger is studied to analyze the effects of the hybrid nanofluid. The nanofluid is employed as the coolant in the tube side, while the hot water flows in the annulus side. Two different nanoparticles including tetramethylammonium hydroxide-coated Fe3O4 (magnetite) nanoparticles and gum arabic-coated carbon nanotubes are used to prepare the water-based hybrid nanofluid. The results demonstrated that the non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid always has a higher heat transfer rate, overall heat transfer coefficient, and effectiveness than those of the Newtonian hybrid nanofluid, while the opposite is true for the pressure drop, pumping power, and performance evaluation criterion. Supposing that the Fe3O4-carbon nanotube/water hybrid nanofluid is a Newtonian fluid with constant thermal conductivity and viscosity, there leads to large error in the computation of pressure drop (1.5–9.71%), pumping power (1.5–9.71%), and performance evaluation criterion (18.24–19.60%), whereas the errors in the computation of heat transfer rate, overall heat transfer coefficient, and effectiveness are not considerable (less than 2.91%).
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1043
页数:12
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Omidi M(2017)A comprehensive review on double pipe heat exchangers Appl Therm Eng 110 1075-1090
[2]  
Farhadi M(2018)A new correlation for predicting the thermal conductivity of ZnO–Ag (50%–50%)/water hybrid nanofluid: an experimental study Powder Technol 323 367-373
[3]  
Jafari M(1995)Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles ASME-Publications-Fed. 231 99-106
[4]  
Esfahani NN(2017)The numerical investigation of heat transfer and pressure drop of turbulent flow in a triangular microchannel Physica E. 93 179-189
[5]  
Toghraie D(2014)Experimental study of Al Int J Heat Mass Transf 78 1042-1054
[6]  
Afrand M(2016)O Chem Eng Res Des 113 112-124
[7]  
Choi S(2016)/water nanofluid turbulent heat transfer enhancement in the horizontal double pipes fitted with modified twisted tapes Appl Therm Eng 100 721-729
[8]  
Estman J(2016)The Influence of magnetic field on heat transfer of magnetic nanofluid in a sinusoidal double pipe heat exchanger Exp Therm Fluid Sci 78 41-49
[9]  
Rezaei O(2017)CFD Investigation and neutral network modeling of heat transfer and pressure drop of nanofluids in double pipe helically baffled heat exchanger with a 3-D fined tube Exp Therm Fluid Sci 85 331-343
[10]  
Akbari OA(2017)Thermal performance of a counter-current double pipe heat exchanger working with COOH-CNT/water nanofluids Exp Therm Fluid Sci 88 37-45