Vacuum therapy in erectile dysfunction—science and clinical evidence

被引:0
作者
J Yuan
A N Hoang
C A Romero
H Lin
Y Dai
R Wang
机构
[1] University of Texas Medical School at Houston,Division of Urology
[2] Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital,undefined
[3] Nanjing University School of Medicine,undefined
[4] Nanjing,undefined
来源
International Journal of Impotence Research | 2010年 / 22卷
关键词
vacuum constriction device; vacuum erectile device; erectile dysfunction; penile rehabilitation; radical prostatectomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Vacuum therapy (VT) utilizes negative pressure to distend the corporal sinusoids and to increase the blood inflow to the penis. Depending on its purpose, VT could be used as vacuum constriction device (VCD), with the aid of an external constricting ring which is placed at the base of penis to prevent blood outflow, maintaining the erection for sexual intercourse. Also, as a vacuum erectile device (VED), without the application of a constriction ring, just increases blood oxygenation to the corpora cavernosa and for other purposes. The emerging of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5I) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) eclipsed VCD as therapeutic choice for ED; however, widespread usage of VED as part of penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy and other purposes rekindle the interest for VT. The underlying hypothesis is that the artificial induction of erections shortly after surgery facilitates tissue oxygenation, reducing cavernosal fibrosis in the absence of nocturnal erections, and potentially increases the likelihood of preserving erectile function. Due to its ability to draw blood into the penis regardless of nerve disturbance, VED has become the centerpiece of penile rehabilitation protocols. Herein, we reviewed the history, mechanism, application, side effects and future direction of VT in ED.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 219
页数:8
相关论文
共 404 条
[1]  
Montague DK(1996)Clinical guidelines panel on erectile dysfunction: summary report on the treatment of organic erectile dysfunction. The American Urological Association J Urol 156 2007-2011
[2]  
Barada JH(1997)External vacuum therapy for erectile dysfunction: use and results World J Urol 15 78-82
[3]  
Belker AM(1986)Noninvasive device to produce and maintain erection-like state Urology 27 126-131
[4]  
Levine LA(1989)Vacuum constriction device for management of erectile dysfunction J Urol 141 320-322
[5]  
Nadig PW(1991)Editorial comment on Clinical experience of vacuum tumescence enhancement therapy for impotence from Int J Impot Res 1990; 1 (suppl 2): 191–196 J Urol 145 1112-535
[6]  
Roehrborn CG(1996)Vacuum erection associated impotence and Peyronie”s disease J Urol 155 534-327
[7]  
Lewis RW(1991)Vacuum constriction devices and the clinical urologist: an informed selection Urology 38 323-203
[8]  
Witherington R(1988)Penile plethysmography on impotent men using vacuum constrictor devices Urology 32 198-1156
[9]  
Nadig PW(1990)Patient acceptance of and satisfaction with an external negative pressure device for impotence J Urol 144 1154-61
[10]  
Ware JC(1992)The hemodynamics of vacuum constriction erections: assessment by color Doppler ultrasound J Urol 147 57-791