Circulating endothelial and endothelial progenitor cells in non-small-cell lung cancer

被引:0
作者
Tania Fleitas
Vicenta Martínez-Sales
José Gómez-Codina
María Martín
Gaspar Reynés
机构
[1] La Fe University Hospital,Medical Oncology Department
[2] La Fe University Hospital,Research Center
来源
Clinical and Translational Oncology | 2010年 / 12卷
关键词
Non-small-cell lung cancer; Circulating endothelial cells; Endothelial progenitor cells; Angiogenesis; Bevacizumab; Targeted therapies;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
New treatments have recently been introduced for treating non-small-cell lung cancer. Chemotherapeutic agents, such as pemetrexed, and targeted therapies, such as bevacizumab, erlotinib or gefitinib, have extended treatment options for selected histological subgroups. Antiangiogenic treatments, either associated with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs or given alone as maintenance therapy, constitute an active clinical research field. However, not all lung cancer patients benefit from antiangiogenic compounds. Moreover, tumour response assessment is often difficult when using these drugs, since targeted therapies generally do not cause rapid and measurable tumour shrinkage but, rather, long stabilisations and slight density changes on imaging tests. The finding of clinical or biological factors that might identify patients who will better benefit from these treatments, as well as identifying surrogate markers of tumour response and prognosis, is an issue of great interest. In that sense, different research lines have investigated the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) pathways. Circulating endothelial (CECs) and endothelial progenitor cells (CEPCs) are of prognostic value in different types of cancers, and relevant data are published about their potential usefulness as predictors of response to chemotherapy and antiangiogenic treatments. In this review, we discuss the data available on the role of CECs and CEPCs as prognostic factors and as surrogate markers of treatment response in non-small-cell lung cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 525
页数:4
相关论文
共 175 条
[1]  
Bunn P.(2008)Systemic treatment for advanced (stage IIIb/IV) non-small cell lung cancer: more treatment options; more things to consider Conclusion. Oncologist 13 37-46
[2]  
Thatcher N.(2002)Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer N Engl J Med 346 92-98
[3]  
Schiller J.(2005)Efficacy of gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy compared with other platinum containing regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta analysis of survival outcomes Lung Cancer 47 69-80
[4]  
Harrington D.(2007)A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials comparing carboplatin-based to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer Lung Cancer 57 348-358
[5]  
Belani C.(2007)Cisplatin-versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis J Natl Cancer Inst 99 847-857
[6]  
Le Chevalier T.(2008)Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer J Clin Oncol 26 3543-3551
[7]  
Scagliotti G.(2009)The differential efficacy of pemetrexed according to NSCLC histology: a review of two phase III studies Oncologist 4 253-263
[8]  
Natale R.(2010)The emerging role of histology in the choice of first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: implication in the clinical decisionmaking Curr Med Chem 17 1030-1038
[9]  
Danson S.(2003)Targeting HER1/EGFR: a molecular approach to cancer therapy Semin Oncol 30 3-14
[10]  
Jiang J.(2009)FLEX Study Team. Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomised phase III trial Lancet 373 1525-1531