Content validity and test-retest reliability of a low back pain questionnaire in Zimbabwean adolescents

被引:11
|
作者
Chiwaridzo M. [1 ,2 ]
Chikasha T.N. [1 ]
Naidoo N. [2 ]
Dambi J.M. [1 ]
Tadyanemhandu C. [1 ]
Munambah N. [1 ]
Chizanga P.T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Rehabilitation Department, University of Zimbabwe, College of Health Sciences, P.O Box A178, Harare, Avondale
[2] Division of Physiotherapy, University of Cape Town, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town
[3] Department of Tourism and Hospitality, Harare Polytechnic College, P.O Box CY 407, Harare, Causeway
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Adolescents; Content Validity; Low Back Pain; Test-retest reliability; Zimbabwe;
D O I
10.1186/s40945-017-0031-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In Zimbabwe, a recent increase in the volume of research on recurrent non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) has revealed that adolescents are commonly affected. This is alarming to health professionals and parents and calls for serious primary preventative strategies to be developed and implemented forthwith. Early identification initiatives should be prioritised in order to curtail the condition and its progression. In an attempt to be proactive in minimising the prevalence of recurrent NSLBP, this study was conducted to evaluate the content validity and test-retest reliability of a survey questionnaire with the aim of proffering a valid and reliable questionnaire which can be used in non-clinical settings to identify adolescents with recurrent NSLBP in Harare, Zimbabwe and determine the possible factors associated with the condition. Methods: The study was conducted in two parts. The first part assessed content validity of the questionnaire using four experts derived from academia and clinical practice. The second part evaluated the reliability of the questionnaire among 125 high school-children aged between 13 and 19 years in a test-retest study. Results: Twenty-six (26) out of thirty questions in the questionnaire had an Item Content Validity index of 1.00, demonstrating complete agreement among content experts. Overall, the Scale Content Validity Index for the questionnaire was 0.97. Item completion for the reliability study was satisfactory. The questionnaire items had kappa values ranging from 0.17 (slight agreement) to 1 (perfect agreement). High levels of reliability were found for the questions on school bag use (k=0.94), sports participation (k=0.97), and lifetime prevalence (k=0.89). Conclusion: Excellent content validity and slight to perfect test-retest reliability was found for the Low Back Pain (LBP) questionnaire. These results are comparable to findings of other studies evaluating the psychometric properties of LBP questionnaires. Cognisant of the limitations of the study, the results of this study suggest that the LBP questionnaire could be used in local studies investigating LBP among adolescents although questions enquiring on functional limitations and sciatica may need further consideration. © 2017, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the Subjective Complaints Questionnaire for low back pain
    Ford, Jon Joseph
    Story, Ian
    McMeeken, Joan
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2009, 14 (03) : 283 - 291
  • [2] Test-retest reliability of patient reports of low back pain
    Roach, KE
    Brown, MD
    Dunigan, KM
    Kusek, CL
    Walas, M
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1997, 26 (05): : 253 - 259
  • [3] The test-retest reliability of a new occupational risk factor questionnaire for outcome studies of low back pain
    Halpern, M
    Hiebert, R
    Nordin, M
    Goldsheyder, D
    Crane, M
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2001, 32 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [4] Validity and test-retest reliability of photogrammetry in adolescents with hyperkyphosis
    Azadinia, Fatemeh
    Hosseinabadi, Mostafa
    Ebrahimi, Ismail
    Mohseni-Bandpei, Mohammad-Ali
    Ghandhari, Hasan
    Yassin, Marzieh
    Behtash, Hamid
    Ganjavian, Mohammad-Saleh
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 38 (13) : 3018 - 3026
  • [5] Test-retest reliability and validity of the Importance of Olfaction Questionnaire in Denmark
    Konieczny, Daniel Tchemerinsky
    Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck
    Sandberg, Kristian
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [6] Test-retest Reliability And Validity Of The Occupational Physical Activity Questionnaire
    Reis, Jared P.
    DuBose, Katrina D.
    Ainsworth, Barbara E.
    Macera, Caroline A.
    Yore, Michelle M.
    Jones, Deborah A.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2005, 37 : S110 - S111
  • [7] The test-retest reliability of a questionnaire on the occurrence and severity of back pain in a German population sample
    Schlademann, Susanne
    Meyer, Thorsten
    Raspe, Heiner
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 53 (02) : 96 - 103
  • [8] Validity and test-retest reliability of a disability questionnaire for essential tremor
    Louis, ED
    Barnes, LF
    Wendt, KJ
    Albert, SM
    Pullman, SL
    Yu, QP
    Schneier, FR
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2000, 15 (03) : 516 - 523
  • [9] Test-retest reliability of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire and the Situational Pain Scale in patients with chronic low back pain
    Opsommer, Emmanuelle
    Hilfiker, Roger
    Raval-Roland, Barbara
    Crombez, Geert
    Rivier, Gilles
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2013, 143
  • [10] The conception, content validation, and test-retest reliability of the Questionnaire for Screen Time of Adolescents (QueST)
    Garro Knebel, Margarethe Thaisi
    Galdino da Costa, Bruno Goncalves
    Dos Santos, Priscila Cristina
    Ferreira Campos de Sousa, Ana Caroline
    Silva, Kelly Samara
    JORNAL DE PEDIATRIA, 2022, 98 (02) : 175 - 182