Shear-wave Velocity Model from Rayleigh Wave Group Velocities Centered on the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta

被引:0
作者
Jon B. Fletcher
Jemile Erdem
机构
[1] US Geological Survey,
来源
Pure and Applied Geophysics | 2017年 / 174卷
关键词
Crustal structure; ambient noise tomography; seismic hazard;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rayleigh wave group velocities obtained from ambient noise tomography are inverted for an upper crustal model of the Central Valley, California, centered on the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta. Two methods were tried; the first uses SURF96, a least squares routine. It provides a good fit to the data, but convergence is dependent on the starting model. The second uses a genetic algorithm, whose starting model is random. This method was tried at several nodes in the model and compared to the output from SURF96. The genetic code is run five times and the variance of the output of all five models can be used to obtain an estimate of error. SURF96 produces a more regular solution mostly because it is typically run with a smoothing constraint. Models from the genetic code are generally consistent with the SURF96 code sometimes producing lower velocities at depth. The full model, calculated using SURF96, employed a 2-pass strategy, which used a variable damping scheme in the first pass. The resulting model shows low velocities near the surface in the Central Valley with a broad asymmetrical sedimentary basin located close to the western edge of the Central Valley near 122°W longitude. At shallow depths, the Rio Vista Basin is found nestled between the Pittsburgh/Kirby Hills and Midland faults, but a significant basin also seems to exist to the west of the Kirby Hills fault. There are other possible correlations between fast and slow velocities in the Central Valley and geologic features such as the Stockton Arch, oil or gas producing regions and the fault-controlled western boundary of the Central Valley.
引用
收藏
页码:3825 / 3839
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Atwater T(1970)Implications of plate tectonics for the Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Western North America Geological Society of America Bulletin 81 3513-3536
  • [2] Barmin MP(2001)A fast and reliable method for surface wave tomography Pure and Applied Geophysics 158 1351-1375
  • [3] Ritzwoller MH(2003)Long-range correlations in the diffuse seismic coda Science 299 547-549
  • [4] Levshin AL(2000)Tectonic evolution of the Jurassic-Cretaceous Great Valley forearc, California: implications for the Franciscan thrust-wedge hypothesis GSA Bulletin 112 1703-1723
  • [5] Campillo M(2016)Tomographic Rayleigh-wave group velocities in the Central Valley, California centered on the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta Journal of Geophysical Research 17 558-570
  • [6] Paul A(1998)Ophiolitic basement to a forearc basin and implications for continental growth: the Coast Range/Great Valley ophiolite, California Tectonics 84 1081-1088
  • [7] Constenius KN(2013)Computer programs in seismology: an evolving tool for instruction and research Seismological Research Letters 100 12769-12790
  • [8] Johnson RA(1995)Regional extent of Great Valley basement west of the Great Valley, California: implications for extensive tectonic wedging in the California Coast ranges Journal of Geophysical Research 100 225-240
  • [9] Dickinson WR(2010)A California statewide three-dimensional seismic velocity model from both absolute and differential times Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 22 523-552
  • [10] Williams WA(1957)Variation with depth of shallow and deep water marine sediment of porosity, density and the velocities of compressional and shear waves Geophysics 81a 149-173