Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Work Ability Index in Working Individuals

被引:0
作者
Claudio Bascour-Sandoval
Francisco Soto-Rodríguez
Claudio Muñoz-Poblete
Gabriel Nasri Marzuca-Nassr
机构
[1] Universidad de La Frontera,Departamento de Medicina Interna
[2] Universidad Autónoma de Chile,Facultad de Ciencias de La Salud
[3] Universidad de Granada,Programa de Doctorado en Medicina Clínica y Salud Pública
[4] Universidad de La Frontera,Departamento de Salud Pública
[5] Universidad de La Frontera,Departamento de Medicina Interna, Facultad de Medicina
来源
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | 2020年 / 30卷
关键词
Workers; Psychometric properties; Work Ability Index; Reliability; Validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is increasingly important to have validated instruments to assess the ability to work. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Work Ability Index (WAI) in working individuals. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 360 workers (men and women) in a high-complexity public hospital and in a public university. The participants were between 40 and 75 years, with a contract of at least 11 h weekly. The ability to work was assessed using the WAI and the perception of health through the Short Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36 v2). The concurrent validity was analyzed, correlating the WAI with the SF-36 v2. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to test construct validity. In addition, the internal consistency of the WAI was analyzed using the standardized Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The WAI showed a positive and statistically significant correlation (p < 0.001) with the SF-36 v2. The exploratory factor analysis showed three factors interpreted as, “Mental Resources”, “Diseases and Health-Related Restrictions”, and “Self-perception of Work Ability”. The reliability of the factors was acceptable, except for the second factor, which was poor. The WAI demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties, such as internal consistency, concurrent and construct validity, constituting a reliable instrument to measure work ability for the population of active working individuals in the service sector.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 297
页数:9
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Ilmarinen J(2006)The ageing workforce: challenges for occupational health Occup Med (Chic Ill) 56 362-364
  • [2] Brouwer S(2003)Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain J Occup Rehabil 13 207-218
  • [3] Reneman MF(2005)Functional capacity evaluation as a performance measure: evidence for a new approach for clients with chronic back pain Clin J Pain 21 207-215
  • [4] Dijkstra PU(2002)Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance-based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain J Occup Rehabil 12 119-129
  • [5] Groothoff JW(2009)Work ability—a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention Scand J Work Environ Health 35 1-5
  • [6] Schellekens JM(2005)Psychometric properties of Work Ability Index in the light of comparative survey study Int Congr Ser 1280 304-309
  • [7] Göeken LN(2016)Relationship between work disability and the use of the Work Ability Index Med Segur Trab (Madr). 62 66-78
  • [8] Gibson L(2015)Psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Work Ability Index (Thai WAI) J Occup Health 57 371-377
  • [9] Strong J(2012)The psychometric properties of an Iranian Translation of the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire J Occup Rehabil 22 401-408
  • [10] Wallace A(2012)Validity and reliability of the Work Ability Index in workers of the first level of health care in Argentina Salud Colect 8 163-173