Social justice: the path to unity

被引:0
作者
Sylvie Bláhová
机构
[1] Department of Political Science of the University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanského 62, Hradec Králové
来源
SN Social Sciences | / 2卷 / 8期
关键词
Equality; Recognition; Redistribution; Social cohesion; Social justice; Unity;
D O I
10.1007/s43545-022-00418-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent debates on social justice have focused mainly on cultural issues. Increasing economic inequalities, especially in the developed world, have demonstrated that socioeconomic issues have not lost their importance. I argue that for social justice to be achieved, both the cultural and socioeconomic spheres need to be considered. These two approaches to social justice interpret the default principle of equality differently: while adherents of the cultural approach understand equality as the recognition of differences, proponents of the socioeconomic approach emphasize universal equal treatment. The paper consequently claims that applying both approaches to social justice can help respond to the shortcomings of exclusively focusing on cultural issues. Emphasizing both paradigms not only acknowledges the interconnection of socioeconomic and cultural issues and provides an adequate response to increasing socioeconomic inequalities, but it also helps address social division: because the socioeconomic paradigm is based on the universalist assumption of equal treatment, it provides a sense of unity. Accordingly, I argue that a sense of unity is crucial for both approaches to justice: without unity neither socioeconomic justice nor cultural justice can be attained. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 54 条
[11]  
Carastathis A., Intersectionality: origins, contestations, horizons, (2016)
[12]  
Carens J., Equality, moral incentives, and the market: an essay in utopian politico-economic theory, (1981)
[13]  
Cawthorne A., (2008)
[14]  
Chambers S., Truth, deliberative democracy, and the virtues of accuracy: is fake news destroying the public sphere?, Political Stud, 69, 1, pp. 147-163, (2020)
[15]  
Cho S., Crenshaw K.W., McCall L., Toward a field of intersectionality studies: theory, application, and praxis, Signs, 38, 4, pp. 785-810, (2013)
[16]  
Cohen G.A., Where the action is: on the site of distributive justice, Philos Public Aff, 26, 1, pp. 3-30, (1997)
[17]  
Dabla-Norris E., Kochhar K., Suphaphiphat N., Ricka F., Tsounta E., (2015)
[18]  
Davidson N., Saull R., Neoliberalism and the far-right: a contradictory embrace, Crit Sociol, 43, 4-5, pp. 707-724, (2016)
[19]  
Dworkin R., What is equality? Part 1: equality of resources, Philos Public Aff, 10, pp. 185-246, (1981)
[20]  
Dworkin R., What is equality? Part 2: equality of welfare, Philos Public Aff, 10, pp. 283-345, (1981)