ZEB1 confers chemotherapeutic resistance to breast cancer by activating ATM

被引:0
作者
Xiang Zhang
Zhen Zhang
Qing Zhang
Quansheng Zhang
Peiqing Sun
Rong Xiang
Guosheng Ren
Shuang Yang
机构
[1] The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery
[2] Medical College of Nankai University,Tianjin Key Laboratory of Tumor Microenvironment and Neurovascular Regulation
[3] Tianjin First Center Hospital,Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation
[4] Wake Forest University School of Medicine,Department of Cancer Biology
来源
Cell Death & Disease | / 9卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) has been identified as a key factor in the regulation of breast cancer differentiation and metastasis, its potential role in modulating tumor chemoresistance has not been fully understood. Here, through the study of specimens from a large cohort of human breast cancer subjects, we showed that patients with tumors that expressed high levels of ZEB1 responded poorly to chemotherapy. Moreover, ZEB1 expression was positively correlated with expression of B-cell lymphoma-extra large (Bcl-xL) and cyclin D1, which are key components of tumor chemoresistant mechanisms. At the molecular level, ectopic expression of ZEB1 impaired the responsiveness of breast cancer cells to genotoxic drug treatment, such as epirubicin (EPI). During this process, ZEB1 transcriptionally activated the expression of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase by forming a ZEB1/p300/PCAF complex on its promoter, leading to increased homologous recombination (HR)-mediated DNA damage repair and the clearance of DNA breaks. Using a nude mouse xenograft model, we further confirmed that ectopic expression of ZEB1 decreased breast cancer responsiveness to EPI treatment in vivo. Collectively, our findings suggest that ZEB1 is a crucial determinant of chemotherapeutic resistance in breast cancer.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]  
Forouzanfar MH(2011)Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis Lancet 378 1461-1484
[2]  
Torre LA(2015)Global cancer statistics, 2012 CA Cancer J. Clin. 65 87-108
[3]  
Stearns V(2004)Pharmacogenetics in the treatment of breast cancer Pharmacogenomics J. 4 143-153
[4]  
Davidson NE(2013)Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm Nat. Rev. Cancer 13 714-726
[5]  
Flockhart DA(2007)DNA double-strand break repair: from mechanistic understanding to cancer treatment DNA Repair 6 923-935
[6]  
Holohan C(2010)The DNA damage response: balancing the scale between cancer and ageing Aging 2 900-907
[7]  
Van Schaeybroeck S(2000)The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective Nature 408 433-439
[8]  
Longley DB(2004)Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73 39-85
[9]  
Johnston PG(2003)ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity Nat. Rev. Cancer 3 155-168
[10]  
Helleday T(2005)DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis Nature 434 864-870