Dualism, monism, physicalism

被引:0
作者
Tim Crane
机构
[1] University College London,Deparment of Philosophy
关键词
physicalism; dualism; mind; ontology; reductionism;
D O I
10.1007/BF02512314
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Dualism can be contrasted with monism, and also with physicalism. It is argued here that what is essential to physicalism is not just its denial of dualism, but the epistemological and ontological authority it gives to physical science. A physicalist view of the mind must be reductive in one or both of the following senses: it must identify mental phenomena with physical phenomena (ontological reduction) or it must give, an explanation of mental phenomena in physical terms (explanatory or conceptual reduction). There is little reason to call a view which is not reductive in either of these senses “physicalism”. If reduction is rejected, then a non-physicalist form of monism is still available, which may be called “emergentism”.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 85
页数:12
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Crane T.(1990)There is no question of physicalism Mind 99 185-206
  • [2] Mellor D.H.(1996)Mental causation Mind 105 377-413
  • [3] Jackson F.(1966)An argument for the identity theory Journal of Philosophy 63 17-25
  • [4] Lewis D.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined