Short-interval cortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation during submaximal voluntary contractions changes with fatigue

被引:0
作者
Sandra K. Hunter
Chris J. McNeil
Jane E. Butler
Simon C. Gandevia
Janet L. Taylor
机构
[1] Marquette University,Exercise Science Program, Department of Physical Therapy
[2] University of British Columbia,School of Health and Exercise Sciences
[3] Neuroscience Research Australia,School of Medical Sciences
[4] The University of New South Wales,Prince of Wales Clinical School
[5] The University of New South Wales,undefined
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2016年 / 234卷
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Motor-evoked potentials; Muscle fatigue; Elbow flexor muscles; Cortical inhibition; Cortical excitation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study determined whether short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) change during a sustained submaximal isometric contraction. On 2 days, 12 participants (6 men, 6 women) performed brief (7-s) elbow flexor contractions before and after a 10-min fatiguing contraction; all contractions were performed at the level of integrated electromyographic activity (EMG) which produced 25 % maximal unfatigued torque. During the brief 7-s and 10-min submaximal contractions, single (test) and paired (conditioning–test) transcranial magnetic stimuli were applied over the motor cortex (5 s apart) to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in biceps brachii. SICI and ICF were elicited on separate days, with a conditioning–test interstimulus interval of 2.5 and 15 ms, respectively. On both days, integrated EMG remained constant while torque fell during the sustained contraction by ~51.5 % from control contractions, perceived effort increased threefold, and MVC declined by 21–22 %. For SICI, the conditioned MEP during control contractions (74.1 ± 2.5 % of unconditioned MEP) increased (less inhibition) during the sustained contraction (last 2.5 min: 86.0 ± 5.1 %; P < 0.05). It remained elevated in recovery contractions at 2 min (82.0 ± 3.8 %; P < 0.05) and returned toward control at 7-min recovery (76.3 ± 3.2 %). ICF during control contractions (conditioned MEP 129.7 ± 4.8 % of unconditioned MEP) decreased (less facilitation) during the sustained contraction (last 2.5 min: 107.6 ± 6.8 %; P < 0.05) and recovered to 122.8 ± 4.3 % during contractions after 2 min of recovery. Both intracortical inhibitory and facilitatory circuits become less excitable with fatigue when assessed during voluntary activity, but their different time courses of recovery suggest different mechanisms for the fatigue-related changes of SICI and ICF.
引用
收藏
页码:2541 / 2551
页数:10
相关论文
共 190 条
  • [1] Baumer T(2002)Fatigue suppresses ipsilateral intracortical facilitation Exp Brain Res 146 467-473
  • [2] Munchau A(2006)Short-interval cortical inhibition and corticomotor excitability with fatiguing hand exercise: a central adaptation to fatigue? Exp Brain Res 170 191-198
  • [3] Weiller C(2001)Motor unit behaviour and contractile changes during fatigue in the human first dorsal interosseus J Physiol 534 903-912
  • [4] Liepert J(1998)Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in different representations of the human motor cortex J Neurophysiol 80 2870-2881
  • [5] Benwell NM(1998)Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits Exp Brain Res 119 265-268
  • [6] Sacco P(2000)Direct demonstration of the effect of lorazepam on the excitability of the human motor cortex Clin Neurophysiol 111 794-799
  • [7] Hammond GR(2002)Two phases of intracortical inhibition revealed by transcranial magnetic threshold tracking Exp Brain Res 143 240-248
  • [8] Byrnes ML(1993)Impairment of neuromuscular propagation during human fatiguing contractions at submaximal forces J Physiol 460 549-572
  • [9] Mastaglia FL(2001)Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue Physiol Rev 81 1725-1789
  • [10] Thickbroom GW(1996)Supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue: evidence for suboptimal output from the motor cortex J Physiol 490 529-536