RODE: Ranking-Dominance-Based Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization with Opposition-Based Differential Evolution

被引:0
作者
Syed Zaffar Qasim
Muhammad Ali Ismail
机构
[1] NED University,Department of Computer and Information Systems
来源
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering | 2020年 / 45卷
关键词
Many-objective optimization; Ranking dominance; Differential evolution; Opposition-based differential evolution; Weight vectors; RODE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During the period of 1990s and early 2000s, the Pareto-dominance (PD) relation was successfully applied for solving multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) with small number of objectives (typically not exceeding four objectives). However, the performance of these PD-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) becomes hopeless when it comes to solving problems with larger number of objectives. Many alternative dominance relations have been proposed in the last few years to improve the search ability of EMO algorithms. In this paper, we present the RODE algorithm as a novel scalable approach for many-objective problems which adopts the ranking-dominance relation for evaluating the fitness of solutions that provides improved convergence. The evolutionary search mechanism employed in our algorithm is the conventional differential evolution (DE) approach. However, for attaining the improved diversity of solutions, we have incorporated the weight vectors and opposition-based differential evolution (ODE) in a unique way. In order to validate our RODE approach, we have compared it with other state-of-the-art MOEAs, namely GDE3, NSGAII and two versions of MOEA/D, namely MOEA/D-TCH and MOEA/D-PBI. All the MOEAs have been executed on the standard benchmark problems DTLZ1-DTLZ4 with 5-, 8-, 10-, 15-, and 20-D objective spaces and MaF03, MaF05 and MaF06 with 8-, 10- and 15-D objective spaces. In almost all the simulation experiments (especially with higher than 5-objectives), our approach has achieved promising results in terms of convergence and diversity of solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:10079 / 10096
页数:17
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Deb K(2014)An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part i: Solving problems with box constraints IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18 577-601
  • [2] Jain H(2016)Visualization and analysis of tradeoffs in many-objective optimization: a case study on the interior permanent magnet motor design IEEE Trans. Magn. 52 1-4
  • [3] Silva R(2018)Configuring software product lines by combining many-objective optimization and sat solvers ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 26 14-1426
  • [4] Salimi A(2011)Software project portfolio optimization with advanced multiobjective evolutionary algorithms Appl. Soft Comput. 11 1416-837
  • [5] Li M(2010)Solving the class responsibility assignment problem in object-oriented analysis with multi-objective genetic algorithms IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 36 817-197
  • [6] Freitas AR(2002)A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: Nsga-ii IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6 182-285
  • [7] Guimarães FG(2014)Fuzzy-based pareto optimality for many-objective evolutionary algorithms IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18 269-315
  • [8] Lowther DA(2016)Generalization of pareto-optimality for many-objective evolutionary optimization IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 20 299-326
  • [9] Xiang Y(2004)A fuzzy definition of“‘ optimality” for many-criteria optimization problems IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 34 315-74
  • [10] Zhou Y(2019)Diversity assessment of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: performance metric and benchmark problems IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 14 61-1522