Variation in Frequency of Intraoperative Arterial, Central Venous and Pulmonary Artery Catheter Placement During Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis of Invasive Monitoring Trends

被引:0
作者
Alexander Nagrebetsky
Richard P. Dutton
Jesse M. Ehrenfeld
Richard D. Urman
机构
[1] Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School,Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine
[2] US Anesthesia Partners (USAP),undefined
[3] Vanderbilt University Medical Center,undefined
[4] Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School,undefined
来源
Journal of Medical Systems | 2018年 / 42卷
关键词
Kidney transplantation; Central venous catheter; Arterial catheter; Pulmonary artery catheter; Hemodynamic monitoring;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The rapidly increasing number of kidney transplantations warrants assessment of anesthesia care in this patient population. We explored the frequency of arterial catheter (AC), central venous catheter (CVC) and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) placement during kidney transplantation in the USA using data from the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry (NACOR) and assessed the between-facility variation in the frequency of catheter placement. We defined cases of kidney transplantation using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classification Software. Placement of AC, CVC and PAC was defined by respective Current Procedural Terminology codes. The frequency of vascular catheter placement across facility types was compared using Pearson χ2 test. We identified 10,580 cases of kidney transplantation performed in 100 facilities from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014. Placement of an AC was reported in 1700 (16.1%), CVC in 2580 (24.4%) and PAC in 50 (0.5%) of cases. The frequency of placement of specific types of catheters was statistically different across facility types (p < 0.001). Within individual facilities that reported at least 50 cases of kidney transplantation, the percentages of cases performed with AC, CVC and PAC ranged from 0% to 86%, 0% to 90% and 0% to 3%, respectively. Considerable between-facility variation in the frequency of AC, CVC and PAC placement during kidney transplantation raises concerns about the need for better practice standardization. Excess invasive monitoring may represent a safety risk as well as unnecessary additional cost. If kidney transplantation can be safely performed without an AC, CVC or PAC in most patients, facilities with above-average catheter placement rates may have an opportunity for measurable reduction in catheter-related perioperative complications. Optimizing perioperative monitoring is an important component of ensuring high functioning, high-value medical systems.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Schmid S(2012)Anaesthesia for renal transplant surgery: An update Eur J Anaesthesiol 29 552-558
[2]  
Jungwirth B(2015)Anaesthesia for renal transplantation: An update Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine 16 334-338
[3]  
Bennett K(2007)Anaesthesia for renal transplant surgery Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51 1354-1367
[4]  
Pace N(2010)Trends in patient characteristics and first-year medical costs of older incident hemodialysis patients, 1995-2005 Am J Kidney Dis 55 549-557
[5]  
SarinKapoor H(2010)Abdominal organ transplantation Minerva Anestesiol 76 266-275
[6]  
Kaur R(2013)Anesthesia and kidney transplantation Transplant Proc 45 1386-1391
[7]  
Kaur H(2015)Making a difference: The anesthesia quality institute Anesth Analg 120 507-509
[8]  
Mau LW(2003)Preventing complications of central venous catheterization N Engl J Med 348 1123-1133
[9]  
Liu J(2015)Intravascular complications of central venous catheterization by insertion site N Engl J Med 373 1220-1229
[10]  
Qiu Y(2013)Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? an updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense Crit Care Med 41 1774-1781