Women’s values and preferences on low-molecular-weight heparin and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic review

被引：0
作者：
Montserrat León-García
Brittany Humphries
Andrea Maraboto
Montserrat Rabassa
Kasey R. Boehmer
Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez
Feng Xie
Irene Pelayo
Mark Eckman
Shannon Bates
Anna Selva
Pablo Alonso-Coello
机构：
[1] Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau),Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine
[2] Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona,Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Medicine
[3] Mayo Clinic,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact
[4] Cytel Inc,Division of Health Care Delivery Research
[5] McMaster University,Evaluation Unit (SESCS)
[6] Mayo Clinic,Network for Research On Chronicity
[7] Canary Islands Health Service (SCS),Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis
[8] Research Network On Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC),Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[9] Primary Care,Faculty of Medicine
[10] and Health Promotion (RICAPPS),Division of General Internal Medicine and Center for Clinical Effectiveness
[11] McMaster University,Department of Medicine
[12] Ramón y Cajal Hospital,Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Screening
[13] Alcalá de Henares University, CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health
[14] University of Cincinnati School of Medicine,undefined
[15] McMaster University,undefined
[16] Corporació Sanitaria Parc Taulí,undefined
[17] CIBERESP,undefined
来源：
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | / 22卷
关键词：
Venous thromboembolism; Low-molecular-weight-heparin; Pregnancy; Values and preferences;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 196 条
[11]  
Lu Y(2020)Patient values and preferences regarding VTE disease: a systematic review to inform American society of hematology guidelines Blood Adv 4 953-968
[12]  
Han T(2008)The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research J Health Serv Res Policy 13 92-98
[13]  
He P(2019)New requirements to include the methodological contribution in articles published in the journal of mixed methods research J Mixed Methods Res 13 138-42
[14]  
Romualdi E(2019)Evidence of patient beliefs, values, and preferences is not provided in osteoporosis clinical practice guidelines Osteoporos Int 30 1325-1337
[15]  
Dentali F(2009)How well do guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences? J Gen Intern Med 24 977-982
[16]  
Rancan E(2019)Colorectal cancer guidelines seldom include the patient perspective J Clin Epidemiol 116 84-97
[17]  
Squizzato A(2021)Decision Analysis in SHared decision making for Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy (DASH-TOP): a sequential explanatory mixed methods pilot study protocol BMJ Open 11 1-12
[18]  
Steidl L(2015)Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays Ann Fam Med 13 554-561
[19]  
Middeldorp S(2015)A mixed-methods approach to systematic reviews Int J Evid Based Healthc 13 121-131
[20]  
Sucker C(2013)Achieving integration in mixed methods designs - Principles and practices Health Services Res 48 2134-56
12345678910