Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a potential conduit for paradoxical embolization to the systemic atrial circulation of a thrombus originating in the venous system. In a selected group of subjects, the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was assessed. Subjects were identified if they underwent magnetic resonance venography (MRV) pelvis and lower extremity doppler (LE-VDU) for assessment of DVT with PFO. The primary outcome measure was to report the number of patients with paradoxical embolization as their suspected etiology of stroke due to the presence of DVT, which then will be considered as determined stroke. Others with determined stroke diagnosis were reported using Treatment of Acute Stroke Trial (TOAST) criteria. At discharge, those without etiology of their stroke were grouped under embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). We further analyzed the prevalence of DVT by age group, ≤ 60 years vs > 60 years to describe if the prevalence is higher with younger age and to evaluate if higher Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (ROPE) score will have higher number of DVTs compared to lower ROPE scores. Of the 293, 19 (7%) were strokes due to paradoxical embolism. At discharge, determined stroke were 54% vs ESUS were 46%. The overall prevalence of DVT was 19 (7%); MRV-pelvis 13 (4%), and LE-VDU was 9 (3%). No significant difference was noted using both modalities. However, in multivariable regression analysis, a trend suggested an association between pelvic thrombi and high ROPE score as the etiology of stroke; OR 3.56 (0.98, 12.93); p = 0.054. Detection of DVT was not associated with PFO, high ROPE scores or young age. Our data indicate an over-reliance of testing for DVT, particularly MRV pelvis with contrast, in patients with PFO. Clinical studies are needed to identify other factors predictive of DVT in patients with ischemic stroke and PFO.
