Network segregation in a model of misinformation and fact-checking

被引:25
|
作者
Tambuscio M. [1 ]
Oliveira D.F.M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ciampaglia G.L. [5 ]
Ruffo G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Computer Science Department, University of Turin, Turin
[2] School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
[3] US Army Research Laboratory, 2800 Powder Mill Rd., Adelphi, 20783, MD
[4] Network Science and Technology Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 335 Materials Research Center 110 8th St., Troy, 12180, NY
[5] Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
来源
Journal of Computational Social Science | 2018年 / 1卷 / 2期
关键词
Agent-based modeling; Fact-checking; Information diffusion; Misinformation; Network segregation;
D O I
10.1007/s42001-018-0018-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Misinformation under the form of rumor, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories spreads on social media at alarming rates. One hypothesis is that, since social media are shaped by homophily, belief in misinformation may be more likely to thrive on those social circles that are segregated from the rest of the network. One possible antidote to misinformation is fact checking which, however, does not always stop rumors from spreading further, owing to selective exposure and our limited attention. What are the conditions under which factual verification are effective at containing the spreading of misinformation? Here we take into account the combination of selective exposure due to network segregation, forgetting (i.e., finite memory), and fact-checking. We consider a compartmental model of two interacting epidemic processes over a network that is segregated between gullible and skeptic users. Extensive simulation and mean-field analysis show that a more segregated network facilitates the spread of a hoax only at low forgetting rates, but has no effect when agents forget at faster rates. This finding may inform the development of mitigation techniques and raise awareness on the risks of uncontrolled misinformation online. © 2018, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 275
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Adding human values on the deepfake: co-designing fact-checking solutions to combat misinformation
    C. H. Maia
    P. Ariel
    S. Nunes
    AI and Ethics, 2025, 5 (3): : 3035 - 3050
  • [42] The performance of truth: politicians, fact-checking journalism, and the struggle to tackle COVID-19 misinformation
    Luengo, Maria
    Garcia-Marin, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CULTURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2020, 8 (03) : 405 - 427
  • [43] The performance of truth: politicians, fact-checking journalism, and the struggle to tackle COVID-19 misinformation
    María Luengo
    David García-Marín
    American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 2020, 8 : 405 - 427
  • [44] Transparency and fact-checking in open societies
    Dierickx, Laurence
    Linden, Carl-Gustav
    JOURNALISM, 2024,
  • [45] The perils and promises of fact-checking with large language models
    Quelle, Dorian
    Bovet, Alexandre
    FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 7
  • [46] Towards Fact-Checking through Crowdsourcing
    Pinto, Marcos Rodrigues
    de Lima, Yuri Oliveira
    Barbosa, Carlos Eduardo
    de Souza, Jano Moreira
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 IEEE 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK IN DESIGN (CSCWD), 2019, : 494 - 499
  • [47] ANALYSIS OF THE FACT-CHECKING INITIATIVES IN SPAIN
    Cardenas Rica, Maria Luisa
    REVISTA INCLUSIONES, 2019, 6 : 62 - 82
  • [48] The Logics of Fact-Checking Website Operations
    Kim, Bumsoo
    Buzzelli, Nicholas R.
    DIGITAL JOURNALISM, 2022, : 1437 - 1460
  • [49] FACT-CHECKING AS A KEY COMPETENCE IN INFODEMIA
    Bulganova, Diana
    MARKETING IDENTITY: COVID-2.0, 2020, : 54 - 61
  • [50] The WEIRD governance of fact-checking and the politics of content moderation
    Vinhas, Otavio
    Bastos, Marco
    NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2023,