Network segregation in a model of misinformation and fact-checking

被引:25
|
作者
Tambuscio M. [1 ]
Oliveira D.F.M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ciampaglia G.L. [5 ]
Ruffo G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Computer Science Department, University of Turin, Turin
[2] School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
[3] US Army Research Laboratory, 2800 Powder Mill Rd., Adelphi, 20783, MD
[4] Network Science and Technology Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 335 Materials Research Center 110 8th St., Troy, 12180, NY
[5] Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
来源
Journal of Computational Social Science | 2018年 / 1卷 / 2期
关键词
Agent-based modeling; Fact-checking; Information diffusion; Misinformation; Network segregation;
D O I
10.1007/s42001-018-0018-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Misinformation under the form of rumor, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories spreads on social media at alarming rates. One hypothesis is that, since social media are shaped by homophily, belief in misinformation may be more likely to thrive on those social circles that are segregated from the rest of the network. One possible antidote to misinformation is fact checking which, however, does not always stop rumors from spreading further, owing to selective exposure and our limited attention. What are the conditions under which factual verification are effective at containing the spreading of misinformation? Here we take into account the combination of selective exposure due to network segregation, forgetting (i.e., finite memory), and fact-checking. We consider a compartmental model of two interacting epidemic processes over a network that is segregated between gullible and skeptic users. Extensive simulation and mean-field analysis show that a more segregated network facilitates the spread of a hoax only at low forgetting rates, but has no effect when agents forget at faster rates. This finding may inform the development of mitigation techniques and raise awareness on the risks of uncontrolled misinformation online. © 2018, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 275
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of Fact-Checking Political Misinformation on Perceptual Accuracy and Epistemic Political Efficacy
    York, Chance
    Ponder, James D.
    Humphries, Zach
    Goodall, Catherine
    Beam, Michael
    Winters, Carrie
    JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2020, 97 (04) : 958 - 980
  • [22] Effects of fact-checking social media vaccine misinformation on attitudes toward vaccines
    Zhang, Jingwen
    Featherstone, Jieyu Ding
    Calabrese, Christopher
    Wojcieszak, Magdalena
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 145
  • [23] Fact-Checking in Journalism: An Epistemological Framework
    Suomalainen, Kari
    Nykanen, Nooa
    Seeck, Hannele
    Kim, Youna
    McPherson, Ella
    JOURNALISM STUDIES, 2025,
  • [24] An emerging genre of contemporary fact-checking
    Junestrom, Amalia
    JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2021, 77 (02) : 501 - 517
  • [25] Fact-checking behaviors of undergraduate students
    Sencan, Ipek
    Soydal, Irem
    INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT, 2023,
  • [26] Fact-checking in China: normative and strategic transparency of Chinese journalists in fact-checking reports
    Zhang, Haiyue
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2025, 35 (02) : 81 - 99
  • [27] Human and Technological Infrastructures of Fact-checking
    Juneja P.
    Mitra T.
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2022, 6 (CSCW2)
  • [28] Limitations of Fact-Checking on Debunking COVID-19 Misinformation on Facebook: the Case of Faktograf.hr
    Brautovic, Mato
    John, Romana
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2023, 16 (01): : 40 - 58
  • [29] FACT-CHECKING VS. FAKE NEWS: CONFIRMATION JOURNALISM AS A TOOL OF MEDIA LITERACY AGAINST MISINFORMATION
    Lotero-Echeverri, Gabriel
    Romero-Rodriguez, Luis M.
    Perez-Rodriguez, Amor
    INDEX COMUNICACION, 2018, 8 (02): : 295 - 316
  • [30] Fostering Artificial Intelligence to Face Misinformation: Discourses and Practices of Automated Fact-Checking in Brazil
    Lelo, Thales
    JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2024, 101 (02) : 320 - 345