Plants as Machines: History, Philosophy and Practical Consequences of an Idea

被引:0
作者
Sophie Gerber
Quentin Hiernaux
机构
[1] Univ. Bordeaux,BIOGECO, INRAE
[2] University of Brussels,Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Religious Sciences, PHI, National Fund for Scientific Research–FNRS
[3] Institut Jean-Nicod,Écoles des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS)
来源
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics | 2022年 / 35卷
关键词
Plant; Machine; Ethics; Philosophy; Agriculture; Biology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper elucidates the philosophical origins of the conception of plants as machines and analyses the contemporary technical and ethical consequences of that thinking. First, we explain the historical relationship between the explicit animal machine thesis of Descartes and the implicit plant machine thesis of today. Our hypothesis is that, although it is rarely discussed, the plant machine thesis remains influential. We define the philosophical criteria for both a moderate and radical interpretation of the thesis. Then, assessing the compatibility of current botanical knowledge with both interpretations, we find that neither withstands scrutiny. We trace how biological and agricultural sciences have historically relied upon thinking of plants as machines and how they continue to do so today through rhetoric centred on breeding, biotechnology, and production. We discuss some of the most important legal and ethical consequences of obscuring the vitality of plants. Finally, we explore less reductive and destructive ways of thinking about, and using, plants.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Baldassarri F(2019)The mechanical life of plants: Descartes on botany The British Journal for the History of Science 52 41-63
[2]  
Baril C(2001)Caractérisation variétale. Les marqueurs moléculaires: Un nouvel outil pour l’inscription et la protection variétale? Oléagineux, Corps Gras, Lipides 8 502-505
[3]  
Bechtel W(2021)Grounding cognition: Heterarchical control mechanisms in biology Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 152 9-36
[4]  
Bich L(2018)Le blé des physiocrates. Contribution à une histoire politique de l’ontologie végétale Cahiers Philosophiques 153 39-41
[5]  
Bertrand A(2018)Penser comme une plante: Perspectives sur l’écologie comportementale et la nature cognitive des plantes Cahiers Philosophiques 26 41-49
[6]  
Bertrand A(2020)Sociabilités végétales? Sens-Dessous 44 109-128
[7]  
Bertrand A(2020)«Elle sera donc odeur de rose, d’oeillet, de jasmin, de violette»: l’attention au végétal et l’institution des collectifs, de Condillac à Descola et retour Anthropologie Et Sociétés 52 63-79
[8]  
Bertrand A(2016)Des limites de la mise en marché de l’environnement Écologie Et Politique 73 118-123
[9]  
Boisvert V(2015)L’agentivité Des Plantes Vacarme 23 58-89
[10]  
Brunon H(2008)Meta-cognition in animals: A skeptical look Mind & Language 153 5-8