Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes

被引:0
作者
Hao Wu
Ryne Estabrook
机构
[1] Boston College,
[2] Northwestern University,undefined
来源
Psychometrika | 2016年 / 81卷
关键词
ordered categorical data; invariance testing; model identification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article considers the identification conditions of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models for ordered categorical outcomes with invariance of different types of parameters across groups. The current practice of invariance testing is to first identify a model with only configural invariance and then test the invariance of parameters based on this identified baseline model. This approach is not optimal because different identification conditions on this baseline model identify the scales of latent continuous responses in different ways. Once an invariance condition is imposed on a parameter, these identification conditions may become restrictions and define statistically non-equivalent models, leading to different conclusions. By analyzing the transformation that leaves the model-implied probabilities of response patterns unchanged, we give identification conditions for models with invariance of different types of parameters without referring to a specific parametrization of the baseline model. Tests based on this approach have the advantage that they do not depend on the specific identification condition chosen for the baseline model.
引用
收藏
页码:1014 / 1045
页数:31
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Babakus E(1987)The sensitivity of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis to violations of measurement scale and distributional assumptions Journal of Marketing Research 24 222-228
  • [2] Ferguson CE(1989)Factoring items and factoring scales are different: Spurious evidence for multidimensionality due to item categorization Psychological Bulletin 105 467-477
  • [3] Jöreskog KG(2011)OpenMx: An open source extended structural equation modeling framework Psychometrika 76 306-317
  • [4] Bernstein IH(2005)Cholesky problems Behavioral Genetics 35 653-665
  • [5] Teng G(2012)A direct comparison approach for testing measurement invariance Organizational Research Methods 15 167-198
  • [6] Boker S(1998)Cross cultural comparisons using non-invariant measurement items Applied Behavioral Science Review 6 93-110
  • [7] Neale M(1999)Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method Journal of Management 25 1-27
  • [8] Maes H(1975)Factor analysis of dichotomized variables Psychometrika 40 5-32
  • [9] Wilde M(1977)Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative Biometrika 64 247-254
  • [10] Spiegel M(1987)Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative Biometrika 74 33-43