Painless improvements to the review process

被引：0
作者：
Juha Iisakka
Ilkka Tervonen
机构：
[1] University of Oulu,Department of Information Processing Science
来源：
Software Quality Journal | 1998年 / 7卷 / 1期
关键词：
review process; review types; improvement;
D O I：
10.1023/B:SQJO.0000042056.11319.bb
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Although the review process is defined in an extremely formal way, each company normally has its own way of tailoring it, because staff tend to see formal reviews as too heavy a method for practical software development. These tailored versions differ in type and in the grade of formality. This paper introduces some easy ways to improve the review process. The goal is to find steps which are simple enough for the management and staff to accept and efficient enough to improve the review process.
引用
收藏
页码：11 / 20
页数：9
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Fagan M. E.(1976)Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development IBM Systems Journal 15 182-211
  • [2] Weller E. F.(1993)Lessons from three years of inspection data IEEE Software 10 38-45
  • [3] Ackerman A. F.(1989)Software inspections: an effective verification process IEEE Software 6 31-36
  • [4] Buchwald L.(1995)Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspections: a replicated experiment IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 21 563-575
  • [5] Lewski F. H.(1996)Reorganizing the inspection process: problems encountered and resolved Software Process - Improvement and Practice 2 97-110
  • [6] Porter A. A.(1993)Does every inspection need a meeting? Proceedings of 1st ACM SIGSOFT Symposium of Foundations of Software Engineering. 18 107-114
  • [7] Votta L. G.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [8] Basili V. R.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [9] Tervonen I.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [10] Oinas-Kukkonen H.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
12