A dynamic analysis of industrial energy efficiency and the rebound effect: implications for carbon emissions and sustainability

被引:0
作者
Golnaz Amjadi
Tommy Lundgren
Wenchao Zhou
机构
[1] STATEC Research,Department of Forest Economic
[2] STATEC (National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies),Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics (CERE)
[3] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,undefined
[4] Umeå University,undefined
来源
Energy Efficiency | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词
Energy efficiency improvement; Rebound effect; Data envelopment analysis; Sustainable economic growth; C0; C33; D22; Q40; Q50;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Energy efficiency improvement (EEI) is generally known to be a cost-effective measure for meeting energy, climate, and sustainable growth targets. Unfortunately, behavioral responses to such improvements (called energy rebound effects) may reduce the expected savings in energy and emissions from EEI. Hence, the size of this effect should be considered to help design efficient energy and climate targets. Currently, there are significant differences in approaches for measuring the rebound effect. Here, we used a two-step procedure to measure both short- and long-term energy rebound effects in the Swedish manufacturing industry. In the first step, we used data envelopment analysis (DEA) to measure energy efficiency. In the second step, we use the efficiency scores and estimated a derived energy demand equation including rebound effects using a dynamic panel regression model. This approach was applied to a firm-level panel dataset covering 14 sectors in Swedish manufacturing over the period 1997–2008. We showed that, in the short run, partial and statistically significant rebound effects exist within all manufacturing sectors, meaning that the rebound effect decreased the energy and emission savings expected from EEI. The long-term rebound effect was in general smaller than the short-term effect, implying that within each sector, energy and emission savings due to EEI are larger in the long run compared to the short run. Using our estimates of energy efficiency and rebound effect, we further performed a post-estimation analysis to provide a guide to policy makers by identifying sectors where EEI have the most potential to promote sustainable economic growth with the lowest environmental impact.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Adetutu MO(2016)Economy-wide estimates of rebound effects: Evidence from panel data Energy Journal 37 251-269
[2]  
Glass AJ(2007)The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom Energy Economics 29 779-798
[3]  
Weyman-Jones TG(2018)The rebound effect in Swedish heavy industry Energy Economics 71 140-148
[4]  
Allan G(2001)Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models Journal of Econometrics 101 123-164
[5]  
Hanley N(1995)Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models Journal of Econometrics 68 29-51
[6]  
McGregor P(2004)Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption Energy Economics 26 123-134
[7]  
Swales K(2015)A microeconomic framework for evaluating energy efficiency rebound and some implications Energy Journal 36 1-21
[8]  
Turner K(2004)A dynamic analysis of interfuel substitution for Swedish heating plants Energy Economics 26 961-976
[9]  
Amjadi G(2010)Environmental policy and profitability – Evidence from Swedish industry Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 12 59-78
[10]  
Lundgren T(2015)The economy wide rebound effect from improved energy efficiency in Swedish industries – A general equilibrium analysis Energy Policy 83 26-37