Differences in leaf nitrogen content, photosynthesis, and resource-use efficiency between Eichhornia crassipes and a native plant Monochoriavaginalis in response to altered sediment nutrient levels

被引:0
作者
Shufeng Fan
Chunhua Liu
Dan Yu
Dong Xie
机构
[1] Wuhan University,The National Field Station of Freshwater Ecosystem of Liangzi Lake, College of Life Science
来源
Hydrobiologia | 2013年 / 711卷
关键词
Biological invasion; Water hyacinth; Photosynthesis; Resource-use efficiency; Fluctuating resources hypothesis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Eichhornia crassipes is one of the world’s most prevalent invasive aquatic plants, causing significant ecological and socio-economic impacts in introduced areas. In this study, we compared the leaf resource capture- and use-related traits of E. crassipes with its confamilial native aquatic plant Monochoria vaginalis at three nutrient levels. Our results showed that leaf nitrogen content based on mass, leaf nitrogen content based on area, N:C, photosynthetic rate, specific leaf area, and leaf construction cost of E. crassipes increased significantly with increasing levels of nutrition, the mean values of these traits increased 0.55, 0.35, 0.51, 0.43, 0.21, and 0.07 times from low nutrient level to high, respectively. These traits (except for the leaf construction cost) in M. vaginalis remained unchanged. At low nutrient level, M. vaginalis had a higher leaf nitrogen content, N:C, photosynthetic rate, specific leaf area, and water-use efficiency than E. crassipes. At high nutrient level, E. crassipes had a higher photosynthetic rate and photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency than M.vaginalis, suggesting that the invasiveness of E. crassipes was dependent on the availability of resources in environment. In addition, our results supported the fluctuating resources hypothesis, indicating that an increased level of nutrients in the environment will increase the invasiveness of E. crassipes.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 137
页数:8
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]  
Abbsi SA(1986)Infestation by aquatic weeds of the fern genus Environmental Conservation 13 235-241
[2]  
Nipaney PC(1999): its status and control Oecologia 121 183-192
[3]  
Baruch Z(1985)Leaf construction cost, nutrient concentration, and net CO Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16 363-392
[4]  
Goldstein G(2004) assimilation of native and invasive species in Hawaii Diversity and Distributions 10 387-397
[5]  
Bloom AJ(1980)Resource limitation in plants—an economic analogy Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11 233-260
[6]  
Chapin FS(1998)A comparison of invasive and non-invasive dayflowers ( Science 279 555-558
[7]  
Mooney HA(2002)) across experimental nutrient and water gradients Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17 202-204
[8]  
Burns JH(2003)The mineral nutrition of wild plants Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34 183-211
[9]  
Chapin FS(2000)Accelerating invasion rate in a highly Invaded estuary Journal of Ecology 88 528-534
[10]  
Cohen AN(1999)Impacts and extent of biotic invasions in terrestrial ecosystems Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14 135-139