The emergence of native multi-sided platforms and their influence on incumbents

被引:0
作者
Andreas Hein
Maximilian Schreieck
Manuel Wiesche
Markus Böhm
Helmut Krcmar
机构
[1] Technical University of Munich,
[2] Chair for Information Systems,undefined
来源
Electronic Markets | 2019年 / 29卷
关键词
Multi-sided platforms; Technological trajectories; Servitization; Platform evolution; Mobility services; Mobility platform; O32; O33; O39; O14;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multi-sided platforms (MSPs) are one of the dominant designs of the digital age. However, prior research focuses mainly on established MSPs, leaving little insight into their emergence. We use the literature on technological trajectories and technology diffusion to derive four propositions that increase our understanding on the emergence of MSPs. The propositions include the emergence of native MSPs based on the assimilation of technologies in technological trajectories; how uncertainty influences incumbents to not follow those trajectories; how native MSPs create new demand; and how this demand eventually triggers the transformation process of incumbents to transform toward an MSP provider. We conduct a multiple-case study in the context of mobility services with three native MSP companies along with an incumbent that is transforming toward an MSP provider. The resulting process model shows that MSPs follow a process of sense-making and bricolage to assemble a service-oriented architecture, contrary to the incumbent who adopts technologies according to its institutional logic to improve existing products and processes.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 647
页数:16
相关论文
共 130 条
  • [1] Alt R(2011)Twenty years of electronic markets research - looking backwards towards the future Electronic Markets 21 41-51
  • [2] Klein S(2010)Service-orientation in electronic markets Electronic Markets 20 177-180
  • [3] Alt R(2005)Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage Administrative Science Quarterly 50 329-366
  • [4] Abramowicz W(2015)How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the Complementors’ perspective Journal of Information Technology 30 209-228
  • [5] Demirkan H(2018)Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect European Economic Review 110 197-210
  • [6] Baker T(2013)Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights MIS Quarterly 37 471-482
  • [7] Nelson RE(2010)Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control Management Science 56 1849-1872
  • [8] Benlian A(2007)Mobile service bundles: The example of navigation services Electronic Markets 17 20-28
  • [9] Hilkert D(2014)How Uber and the sharing economy can win over regulators Harvard Business Review 13 24-28
  • [10] Hess T(2015)Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector Research Policy 44 577-595