Spillover from past recycling to green apparel shopping behavior: the role of environmental concern and anticipated guilt

被引:24
作者
Ha S. [1 ]
Kwon S.Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Retail, Hospitality and Tourism Management, College of Education, Health, and Human Sciences, University of Tennessee, 1215 W. Cumberland Ave, Knoxville, 37996-1911, TN
[2] Department of Management Information Systems, College of Business & Economics, Korea University, Sejong Campus, 2511 Sejong-ro, Sejong City
关键词
Anticipated guilt; Environmental concern; Green apparel shopping; Past recycling; Spillover;
D O I
10.1186/s40691-016-0068-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study explores catalytic behavior in the context of pro-environmental behaviors by examining the occurrence of spillover that performing recycling behavior promotes the likelihood to engage in green apparel purchases. Additionally, this study incorporates a potential mediator and a moderator, environmental concern and anticipated guilt, respectively, in order to explain the nature of the spillover process. The results of online survey data confirm the development of spillover in consumer behavior that past recycling behavior does spill over into green apparel/fashion product purchase behaviors through one’s motivational belief toward the environment, environmental concern. However, anticipated guilt, a motivation factor, does not moderate spillover among pro-environmental behaviors, at least between past recycling behavior and green apparel shopping behaviors. Theoretically, this study contributes to and extends the literature on spillover in pro-environmental behaviors by testing spillover across distinctive pro-environmental behaviors. This study also provides lessons for fashion retail marketers and government agencies in learning the importance of the social and ethical aspects of consumers’ green practices, beyond price/quality-based choices. Limitations and future research directions are discussed. © 2016, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Aitken C.K., McMahon T.A., Wearing A.J., Finlayson B.L., Residential water use: Predicting and reducing consumption, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 2, pp. 136-158, (1994)
[2]  
Ajzen I., The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, pp. 179-211, (1991)
[3]  
Bagozzi R.P., Baumgartner H., Yi Y., State versus action orientation and the theory of reasoned action: An application to coupon usage, Journal of Consumer Research, 18, pp. 505-518, (1992)
[4]  
Bamberg S., How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, pp. 21-32, (2003)
[5]  
Baron R., Kenny D.A., The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6, pp. 1173-1182, (1986)
[6]  
Barr S., Gilg A.W., Ford N., The household energy gap: Examining the divide between habitual and purchase-related conservation behaviors, Energy Policy, 33, pp. 1425-1444, (2005)
[7]  
Baumeister R.F., Stillwell A.M., Heatherton T.F., Guilt: An interpersonal approach, Psychological Bulletin, 115, pp. 243-267, (1994)
[8]  
Baumeister R.F., Vohs K.D., DeWall C.N., Zhang L., How emotion shapes behavior: feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, pp. 167-203, (2007)
[9]  
Bem D.J., Self-perception theory, Advances in experimental social psychology, 6, pp. 1-62, (1972)
[10]  
Cornelissen G., Dewitte S., Warlop L., Yzerbyt V., Whatever people say I am, that’s what I am: Social labeling as a social marketing tool, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, pp. 278-288, (2007)