Creating visual explanations improves learning

被引:144
作者
Bobek E. [1 ]
Tversky B. [2 ]
机构
[1] University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA
[2] Stanford University, Columbia University Teachers College, New York, NY
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Complex system; Diagrammatic reasoning; Dynamic system; Learning; Process; Spatial ability; STEM; Structure; Visual communication;
D O I
10.1186/s41235-016-0031-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many topics in science are notoriously difficult for students to learn. Mechanisms and processes outside student experience present particular challenges. While instruction typically involves visualizations, students usually explain in words. Because visual explanations can show parts and processes of complex systems directly, creating them should have benefits beyond creating verbal explanations. We compared learning from creating visual or verbal explanations for two STEM domains, a mechanical system (bicycle pump) and a chemical system (bonding). Both kinds of explanations were analyzed for content and learning assess by a post-test. For the mechanical system, creating a visual explanation increased understanding particularly for participants of low spatial ability. For the chemical system, creating both visual and verbal explanations improved learning without new teaching. Creating a visual explanation was superior and benefitted participants of both high and low spatial ability. Visual explanations often included crucial yet invisible features. The greater effectiveness of visual explanations appears attributable to the checks they provide for completeness and coherence as well as to their roles as platforms for inference. The benefits should generalize to other domains like the social sciences, history, and archeology where important information can be visualized. Together, the findings provide support for the use of learner-generated visual explanations as a powerful learning tool. © 2016, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Ainsworth S.E., Bibby P.A., Wood D.J., Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 1, pp. 25-62, (2002)
[2]  
Ainsworth S.E., Iacovides I., Learning by constructing self-explanation diagrams, Paper Presented at the 11Th Biennial Conference of European Association for Resarch on Learning and Instruction, (2005)
[3]  
Ainsworth S.E., Loizou A.T., The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams, Cognitive Science, 27, 4, pp. 669-681, (2003)
[4]  
Ainsworth S., Prain V., Tytler R., Drawing to learn in science, Science, 26, pp. 1096-1097, (2011)
[5]  
Alesandrini K.L., Pictorial-verbal and analytic-holistic learning strategies in science learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, pp. 358-368, (1981)
[6]  
Aleven V., Koedinger K.R., An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor, Cognitive Science, 26, pp. 147-179, (2002)
[7]  
Baenninger M., Newcombe N., The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis, Sex Roles, 20, 5-6, pp. 327-344, (1989)
[8]  
Bradley J.D., Brand M., Stamping out misconceptions, Journal of Chemical Education, 62, 4, (1985)
[9]  
Chi M.T., Active-Constructive-Interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities, Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, pp. 73-105, (2009)
[10]  
Chi M.T.H., DeLeeuw N., Chiu M., LaVancher C., Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding, Cognitive Science, 18, pp. 439-477, (1994)