Alternative Fixation in Osteoporotic Fractures

被引:0
作者
Tafur D. [1 ]
Cabrera D.A. [1 ]
Salavarrieta J. [1 ]
Olarte C.M. [1 ]
Pesántez R.F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Avenida 9ª # 116-20 Consultorio 820, Bogotá
关键词
Fracture fixation; Fragility fractures; Implant augmentation; Orthogeriatrics; Osteoporosis;
D O I
10.1007/s13670-017-0211-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of Review: The goal of this paper is to review the current available literature in alternative fixation in osteoporotic fractures, including the roles of locking plates, polyaxial screws, bone augmentation techniques, arthroplasty, and implant coating, as well as the role of co-managed care. Recent Findings: Bone mineral density has a definitive role in fixation failure in osteoporotic bone; in some regions, such as the femoral head, if the BMD is below 250 mg/cm3, the failure rate will increase; if these areas can be identified and the fixation strength on them improved, the failure will decrease. In order to improve the fixation strength, several strategies have been explored: locking plates, polyaxial plates and screws, augmentation of the bone with cement or bone substitutes, implant coating, and at last, the use of arthroplasty as primary treatment in severe osteoporosis and periarticular and articular fractures. Summary: Osteoporotic fracture care continues to be a challenge, especially in fracture fixation. There has been recent improvement in the approach to these complex injuries, starting with orthogeriatric co-management models of care to improve patient care and outcomes. Additionally, surgical options have improved through advances in surgical techniques, augmentation of proximal femur and proximal humerus fractures, locking polyaxial implants, and improved coating of implants and arthroplasty. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 201
页数:5
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] Egol K.A., Kubiak E.N., Fulkerson E., Kummer F.J., Koval K.J., Biomechanics of locked plates and screws, J Orthop Trauma, 18, pp. 488-493, (2004)
  • [12] Hanschen M., Aschenbrenner I.M., Fehske K., Et al., Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures: a prospective randomized multicentre clinical trial, Int Orthop, 38, pp. 857-863, (2014)
  • [13] El-Zayat B.F., Efe T., Ruchholtz S., Khatib S., Timmesfeld N., Kruger A., Zettl R., Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures—a biomechanical comparison of the non-contact-bridging- (NCB) and the PERILOC-plate, BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 15, (2014)
  • [14] Lenz M., Wahl D., Gueorguiev B., Jupiter J.B., Perren S.M., Concept of variable angle locking—evolution and mechanical evaluation of a recent technology, J Orthop Res, 33, pp. 988-992, (2015)
  • [15] Lampropoulou-Adamidou K., Tosounidis T.H., Kanakaris N.K., Ekkernkamp A., Wich M., Giannoudis P.V., The outcome of Polyax locked plating system for fixation distal femoral non-implant related and periprosthetic fractures, Injury, 46, pp. S18-S24, (2015)
  • [16] Bekler H., Bulut G., Usta M., Gokce A., Okyar F., Beyzadeoglu T., The contribution of locked screw-plate fixation with varying angle configurations to stability of osteoporotic fractures: an experimental study, Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 42, pp. 125-129, (2008)
  • [17] Kammerlander C., Erhart S., Doshi H., Gosch M., Blauth M., Principles of osteoporotic fracture treatment, Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol, 27, pp. 757-769, (2013)
  • [18] Mariconda M., Costa G., Misami M., Recano P., Balato G., Rizzo M., Ambulatory ability and personal independence after hemiarthroplasty and total arthroplasty for intracapsular hip fracture: a prospective comparative study, J Arthroplast, 32, 2, pp. 447-452, (2017)
  • [19] Mariconda M., Costa G.G., Cerbasi S., Recano P., Orabona G., Gambacorta M., Misasi M., Factors predicting mobility and the change in activities of daily living after hip fracture: a 1-year prospective cohort study, J Orthop Trauma, 30, 2, pp. 71-77, (2016)
  • [20] Moroni A., Larsson S., Hoang Kim A., Gelsomini L., Giannoudis P.V., Can we improve fixation and outcomes? Use of bone substitutes, J Orthop Trauma, 23, pp. 422-425, (2009)