Alternative Fixation in Osteoporotic Fractures

被引：0
作者：
Tafur D. [1 ]
Cabrera D.A. [1 ]
Salavarrieta J. [1 ]
Olarte C.M. [1 ]
Pesántez R.F. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Avenida 9ª # 116-20 Consultorio 820, Bogotá
来源：
Current Geriatrics Reports | 2017年 / 6卷 / 3期
关键词：
Fracture fixation; Fragility fractures; Implant augmentation; Orthogeriatrics; Osteoporosis;
D O I：
10.1007/s13670-017-0211-3
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Purpose of Review: The goal of this paper is to review the current available literature in alternative fixation in osteoporotic fractures, including the roles of locking plates, polyaxial screws, bone augmentation techniques, arthroplasty, and implant coating, as well as the role of co-managed care. Recent Findings: Bone mineral density has a definitive role in fixation failure in osteoporotic bone; in some regions, such as the femoral head, if the BMD is below 250 mg/cm3, the failure rate will increase; if these areas can be identified and the fixation strength on them improved, the failure will decrease. In order to improve the fixation strength, several strategies have been explored: locking plates, polyaxial plates and screws, augmentation of the bone with cement or bone substitutes, implant coating, and at last, the use of arthroplasty as primary treatment in severe osteoporosis and periarticular and articular fractures. Summary: Osteoporotic fracture care continues to be a challenge, especially in fracture fixation. There has been recent improvement in the approach to these complex injuries, starting with orthogeriatric co-management models of care to improve patient care and outcomes. Additionally, surgical options have improved through advances in surgical techniques, augmentation of proximal femur and proximal humerus fractures, locking polyaxial implants, and improved coating of implants and arthroplasty. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码：196 / 201
页数：5
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Burge R., Dawson-Hughes B., Solomon D.H., Wong J.B., King A., Tosteson A., Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025, J Bone Miner Res, 22, pp. 465-475, (2007)
  • [2] Kammerlander C., Neuerburg C., Verlaan J.-J., Schmoelz W., Miclau T., Larsson S., The use of augmentation techniques in osteoporotic fracture fixation, Injury, 47, pp. S36-S43, (2016)
  • [3] Goldhahn S., Kralinger F., Rikli D., Marent M., Goldhahn J., Does osteoporosis increase complication risk in surgical fracture treatment? A protocol combining new endpoints for two prospective multicentre open cohort studies, BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 11, (2010)
  • [4] Burr D.B., Forwood M.R., Fyhrie D.P., Martin R.B., Schaffler M.B., Turner C.H., Bone microdamage and skeletal fragility in osteoporotic and stress fractures, J Bone Miner Res, 12, pp. 6-15, (1997)
  • [5] Nikolaou V.S., Efstathopoulos N., Kontakis G., Kanakaris N.K., Giannoudis P.V., The influence of osteoporosis in femoral fracture healing time, Injury, 40, pp. 663-668, (2009)
  • [6] Goldhahn S., Sawaguchi T., Audige L., Mundi R., Hanson B., Bhandari M., Goldhahn J., Complication reporting in orthopaedic trials. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91, pp. 1847-1853, (2009)
  • [7] Konstantinidis L., Helwig P., Hirschmuller A., Langenmair E., Sudkamp N.P., Augat P., When is the stability of a fracture fixation limited by osteoporotic bone?, Injury, 47, pp. S27-S32, (2016)
  • [8] Gautier E., Perren S.M., Cordey J., Effect of plate position relative to bending direction on the rigidity of a plate osteosynthesis. A theoretical analysis, Injury, 31, pp. C14-C20, (2000)
  • [9] Giannoudis P.V., Schneider E., Principles of fixation of osteoporotic fractures, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88, pp. 1272-1278, (2006)
  • [10] Tejwani N.C., Guerado E., Improving fixation of the osteoporotic fracture: the role of locked plating, J Orthop Trauma, 25, pp. S56-S60, (2011)
12345