Universal Hearing Screening in Newborns Using Otoacoustic Emissions and Brainstem Evoked Response in Eastern Uttar Pradesh

被引:5
作者
Kumar A. [1 ]
Gupta S.C. [2 ]
Sinha V.R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery, U.P. University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, 206130, U.P.
[2] INHS Asvini, Mumbai
[3] Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery, Army Hospital (R&R), New Delhi
关键词
Brain-stem evoked response audiometry; Otoacoustic Emissions; Universal Hearing Screening;
D O I
10.1007/s12070-017-1081-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objectives were to determine the incidence of hearing impairment in a standardized population of neonates and to determine the significance of association of epidemiological and risk factors with neonatal hearing loss. A cohort of 600 newborns was selected for study and divided into two groups—525 in ‘No Risk’ group and remaining 75 in ‘At Risk’ group. The study protocol was carried out in three steps: (a) Screening of Hearing Loss with TOAE, done from 36 h after birth to 28 days of life, (b) Re-screening of hearing loss in newborns (of 4–12 weeks of age), who were tested positive for hearing loss in the first screening, done with DPOAE, (c) Confirmation of hearing loss with BERA, in those who were tested positive in both the first and second screening. In the study the incidence of hearing impairment in 600 infants screened was 6.67 per 1000 screened; 3.81 per 1000 screened in the Not at Risk group and 26.67 per 1000 screened in At Risk group. In At Risk group, admitted to the NICU, severe birth asphyxia and hyperbilirubinemia were found to be major risk factors. Loss to follow up was more in Not at Risk group and False Positive cases with TEOAE were more than DPOAE. BERA was found to be must for confirmation of hearing loss. Neonatal Hearing Screening of only At Risk population is likely to miss some hearing loss. Universal Hearing Screening should be the preferred strategy. Good follow up in the ‘At Risk’ group suggests that initial interventions in NICU had sensitized the parents for the possibility of hearing loss. This study recommends the introduction of two stage neonatal screening–rescreening protocol, using OAE and BERA, in the country in phased manner. © 2017, Association of Otolaryngologists of India.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 299
页数:3
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs, Pediatrics, 120, (2007)
[2]  
Downs M.P., Universal newborn hearing screening—the Colorado story, Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 32, pp. 257-259, (1995)
[3]  
Vohr B.R., Carty L., Moore P., Letourneau K., The Rhode Island hearing assessment program: experience with statewide hearing screening (1993–1996), J Pediatr, 128, pp. 710-714, (1998)
[4]  
A blueprint for closing the gap, (2001)
[5]  
Johnson J.L., Kuntz N.L., Sia C.C., White K.R., Johnson R.L., Newborn hearing screening in Hawaii, Hawaii Med J, 56, 12, pp. 352-355, (1997)
[6]  
Connolly J.L., Carron J.D., Roark S.D., Universal newborn hearing screening: are we achieving the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) objectives, Laryngoscope, 115, 2, pp. 232-236, (2005)
[7]  
Gravel J.S., Evidence-based pediatric audiology, A sound foundation through early amplification 2004: proceedings of the 3rd international conference. Immediate Proceedings, pp. 17-26, (2005)
[8]  
Gravel J., Berg A., Bradley M., Cacace A., Campbell D., Dalzell L., Et al., New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: effects of screening protocol on inpatient outcome measures, Ear Hear, 21, pp. 131-140, (2000)
[9]  
Gravel J., White K., Johnson J., Et al., A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: results of visual reinforcement audiometry, Am J Audiol, 14, 2, pp. S200-S216, (2005)
[10]  
Gravel J., Roberts J., Roush J., Grose J., Besing J., Burchinal M., Neebe E., Wallace I., Zeisel S., Early otitis media with effusion, hearing loss, and auditory processes at school age, Ear Hear, 27, 4, pp. 353-368, (2006)