Assessment of Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability in Anesthetized Children: A Comparative Study Between Intraarterial and Finger Blood Pressure

被引:0
作者
Isabelle Constant
Dominique Laude
Jean-Luc Elghozi
Isabelle Murat
机构
[1] Hôpital Armand Trousseau,Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation Pédiatrique
[2] Association Claude Bernard,Centre de Pharmacologie Clinique
[3] CNRS URA 1482,undefined
[4] Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades,undefined
来源
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | 1999年 / 15卷
关键词
anesthesia; recovery; sympathetic; blood pressure; variability; children;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. Continuous blood pressure (BP) measurement provides instantaneous information on hemodynamic status, and allows for assessment of sympathetic modulation of vasomotor tone using spectral analysis. As an alternative to intraarterial blood pressure (IABP) measurement, the Finapres, a photoplethysmographic device, allows for non-invasive continuous measurement of finger blood pressure (FBP). This study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of spectral measurements of FBP variability in children during anesthesia and recovery. For this purpose, reliability of BP measurement and short-term BP variability assessed by FBP were calculated and compared with IABP. Methods. Finger blood pressure was compared with IABP from the ipsilateral radial artery, in 14 children undergoing major surgery. Sixty-seven simultaneous recordings of both signals were performed during anesthesia and 32 during recovery period. The accuracy of the FBP was determined by measuring its bias and precisi on according to the Bland and Altman method. To assess the ability of the FBP to follow short term BP variability, bias of total spectral power and bias of the 3 main spectral components (LF, MF, HF) were calculated. Transfer functions between invasive and non-invasive signals were calculated. Results. The average bias of SBP measurement was 3.8 ± 7.4 mmHg during anesthesia and 2.2 ± 6.7 mmHg during recovery. During anesthesia overall variability and spectral components of FBP and IABP were similar with both techniques; while during recovery, a selective amplification of the low frequencies (<0.15 Hz) of FBP was observed. Frequency response analysis of the pressure waveform, showed a high coherence between both signal with a gain of 0.96 ± 0.52 mmHg FBP/mmHg IABP under anesthesia, and of 0.74 mmHg FBP/mmHg IABP during recovery. Conclusions. The differences evidenced between FBP and IABP spectral profiles might result from specific physiological properties of dig ital arteries, which are sympathetic effectors. This study supports the use of FBP in children to assess non-invasively the vascular sympathetic component of the autonomic nervous system during anesthesia and recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 214
页数:9
相关论文
共 157 条
[11]  
Mangano RF(1989)Comparison of finger and intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring at rest and during laboratory testing Hyper-tension 13 647-655
[12]  
Hickey J(1990)Non-invasive continuous finger blood pressure measurement during orthostatic stress compared to intra-arterial pressure Cardiovasc Res 24 214-221
[13]  
van Egmond M(1995)Beat-to-beat agreement of non-invasive finger artery and invasive radial artery blood pressure in hypertensive patients taking cardiovascular medication Clin Physiol 15 219-229
[14]  
Hasenbos JF(1991)The child with recurrent syncope: Autonomic function testing and beta-adrenergic hyper-sensitivity J Am Coll Cardiol 17 1168-1171
[15]  
Crul RH(1998)Heart rate control of blood pressure variabil-ity in children: A study in subjects with fixed ventricular pacemaker rythm Clin Sci 95 33-42
[16]  
Epstein RR(1998)Heart rate and blood pressure variability during halothane or sevoflur-ane anesthesia in children Anesthesiology 89 A1253-20
[17]  
Bartkowski S(1994)Comparison of intraarterial with continuous noninvasive blood pressure measurement in postoperative pediatric patients J Clin Monit 10 11-102
[18]  
Huffnagle HA(1995)Spectral analysis of systolic blood pressure and heart rate after heart transplantation in children Clin Sci (Colch) 88 95-46
[19]  
Aitken JG(1994)Optimal frequency ranges for extracting information on autonomic activity from the heart rate spectrogram J Auton Nerv Syst 46 37-H1245
[20]  
Todd GN(1986)Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 307 310-543