High titres of IgM-antiphospholipid antibodies are unrelated to pathogenicity in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

被引:0
作者
W. Miesbach
I. Scharrer
R. A. Asherson
机构
[1] Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University,Internal Medicine III, University Hospital
[2] Cape Town and the Rosebank Clinic,Rheumatic Diseases Unit, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Centre
来源
Clinical Rheumatology | 2007年 / 26卷
关键词
Antiphospholipid syndrome; IgM-anticardiolipin; Malignancy; Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; Thrombosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Heterogeneity in the mechanisms of coagulation may contribute to an increased thrombotic risk for patients with malignancies. The coincidence of malignancies and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have been described in several important epidemiological studies. The pathological significance of aPL in patients with malignancies is, however, still unclear. In this study, we investigated the clinical manifestations of four patients with elevated IgM-aPL titres lying outside the region signifying 95% of normal cases and with a history of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The patients had elevated IgG- and IgM-anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and also tested positive for lupus anticoagulants. Other aPL were measured, and we found high positive results for all tested antibodies in three patients. The production of aPL, however, occurred in the absence of thrombotic complications. No thromboembolic manifestations occurred during the follow-up period either. It could also be demonstrated that the degree to which the aCL titre was elevated resembles the elevation of the non-classical antiphospholipid antibodies, but not that of β2-GP-1 or anti-annexin antibodies. Therefore, it can be postulated that these extremely high levels of IgM-aCL antibodies do not enhance the risk of thrombosis and may be completely different from aCL antibodies in an antiphospholipid syndrome patient population without malignancies. In particular, haematological and lymphoproliferative malignancies may indeed be associated with the generation of aPL, but do not necessarily enhance the thrombophilic risk in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 97
页数:2
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Wilson WA(1999)International consensus statement on preliminary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome: report of an international workshop Arthritis Rheum 42 1309-1311
  • [2] Gharavi AE(2000)Antiphospholipid antibodies, malignancies and paraproteinemias J Autoimmun 15 117-122
  • [3] Koike T(2004)Antiphospholipid antibodies in lymphoma: prevalence and clinical significance Hematol J 5 341-346
  • [4] Asherson RA(2001)Induction and treatment of the antiphospholipid sydnrome—lessons from animal models Eur J Clin Invest 31 736-740
  • [5] Pusterla S(2002)Revisiting the anticardiolipin test and its standardization Lupus 11 269-275
  • [6] Previtali S(1995)Criteria for the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants: an update. On behalf of the Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibody of the Scientific and Standardisation Committee of the ISTH Thromb Haemost 74 1185-1190
  • [7] Marziali S(2005)Identification of thrombin antibodies in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome Ann N Y Acad Sci 1050 250-256
  • [8] Shoenfeld Y(1997)IgG anticardiolipin antibody titer >40 GPL and the risk of subsequent thrombo-occlusive events and death. A prospective cohort study Stroke 28 1660-1665
  • [9] Blank M(2003)Lupus anticoagulants are stronger risk factors for thrombosis than anticardiolipin antibodies in the antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature Blood 101 1827-1832
  • [10] Sherer Y(2006)Prediction and prevention of autoimmune diseases: additional aspects of the mosaic of autoimmunity Lupus 15 183-190