Safety, the Preface Paradox and Possible Worlds Semantics

被引：0
作者：
Michael J. Shaffer
机构：
[1] St. Cloud State University,Department of Philosophy, CH 365
来源：
Axiomathes | 2019年 / 29卷
关键词：
Preface paradox; Semantic knowledge; Safety; Knowledge; Semantics; Possible worlds;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This paper contains an argument to the effect that possible worlds semantics renders semantic knowledge impossible, no matter what ontological interpretation is given to possible worlds. The essential contention made is that possible worlds semantic knowledge is unsafe and this is shown by a parallel with the preface paradox.
引用
收藏
页码：347 / 361
页数：14
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Adams R(1974)Theories of actuality Noûs 8 211-231
[2]  
Copeland J(2002)The genesis of possible worlds semantics J Philos Log 31 99-137
[3]  
Forrester P(1986)Ways worlds could be Aust J Philos 64 15-24
[4]  
Hintikka J(1983)Situations, possible worlds and attitudes Synthese 54 153-162
[5]  
Lewis D(1970)General semantics Synthese 22 18-67
[6]  
Makinson D(1965)The paradox of the preface Analysis 25 205-207
[7]  
Pritchard D(2007)Anti-luck epistemology Synthese 158 277-298
[8]  
Pritchard D(2009)Safety-based epistemology: whither now? J Philos Res 34 33-45
[9]  
Shaffer M(2017)An argument for the safety condition Logos Episteme 8 517-520
[10]  
Shaffer M(2018)Safety and the preface paradox Log Episteme 9 215-219
12