The Use of Feedback in Improving the Knowledge, Attitudes and Skills of Medical Students: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引：0
作者：
Margareth Alves Bastos e Castro
Regina Lúcia Muniz de Almeida
Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti
Sandra Helena Cerrato Tibiriçá
Oscarina da Silva Ezequiel
Giancarlo Lucchetti
机构：
[1] Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF),School of Medicine
[2] Faculdade de Ciências Médicas E da Saúde de Juiz de Fora (FCMSJF),School of Medicine
[3] UFJF,Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine
来源：
Medical Science Educator | 2021年 / 31卷
关键词：
Feedback; Medical students; Medical education; Systematic review; Meta-analysis;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the use of different feedback modalities in improving the knowledge, attitudes, and skills of medical students compared to students receiving no feedback or unstructured feedback. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted based on a search of the Cochrane, ERIC, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. A total of 26 studies were included for the systematic review and 13 for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that the use of feedback was associated with better results compared to control groups (SMD = 0.80 [0.56–1.04], p < 0.001), and also when only high-quality studies were included (SMD = 0.86 [0.56–1.16], p < 0.001). Our findings revealed high heterogeneity in the use of feedback in medical education. However, the results of most of the studies and of the meta-analysis were positive, showing that feedback had a positive influence on the education-learning process of the students. PROSPERO registration: CRD42018112688.
引用
收藏
页码：2093 / 2104
页数：11
相关论文
共 222 条
[21]  
ten Cate OT(2017)Feedback in medical education: a critical appraisal AEM education and training 1 98-88
[22]  
Khalil MK(2014)Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training: a meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 19 251-226
[23]  
Elkhider IA(2020)An updated primer on entrustable professional activities (EPAs) Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica 43 712-60
[24]  
Ramani S(2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement Syst Rev 4 1-S58
[25]  
Konings KD(2018)Kirkpatrick's evaluation of simulation and debriefing in health care education: a systematic review J Nurs Educ 57 393-749
[26]  
Ginsburg S(2009)A general framework for the evaluation of clinical trial quality Rev Recent Clin Trials 4 79-241
[27]  
van der Vleuten CP(2017)Effectiveness of feedback with a smartwatch for high-quality chest compressions during adult cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled simulation study PLoS ONE 12 219-397
[28]  
Al-Jundi W(2012)Influence of pre-course assessment using an emotionally activating stimulus with feedback: a pilot study in teaching Basic Life Support Resuscitation 83 53-248
[29]  
Elsharif M(2015)Effect of instructor feedback on skills retention after laparoscopic simulator training: follow-up of a randomized trial J Surg Educ 72 S56-68
[30]  
Anderson M(2000)Learning adolescent psychosocial interviewing using simulated patients Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 75 746-801
12345678910