Research Ethics in the Securitised University

被引:0
作者
Liam F. Gearon
Scott Parsons
机构
[1] University of Oxford,
[2] United States Military Academy,undefined
来源
Journal of Academic Ethics | 2019年 / 17卷
关键词
Research ethics; Security; Intelligence agencies; Universities;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Addressing the complex and longstanding relationship between universities and security and intelligence agencies, this article provides a tentative, working conceptual framework for research ethics in a global higher education environment. The article does so in the light of intensified threats of international terrorism which have brought this historic relationship to the contemporary foreground of academic life. Seeing higher education environments as part of a broader process of enhanced security in societies worldwide, we use securitization theory to provide an analytical framework specifically for understanding a complex of historical-contemporary relationships between universities and security and intelligence agencies. As the basis for framing the ethical issues which arise for researchers across all disciplines, the intention is to raise awareness of a relationship which by its very, especially historical, nature, has been secret. The article suggests identify a three-fold analytical framework were structural, operational and ethical considerations are interwoven in complex ways. At the structural level we identify three modus operandi (covert, overt, covert-overt); and four academic ethical principles (standards; freedom; engagement; conduct). While the conceptual framework presented makes no pretence of offering a complete or comprehensive picture of a complex and still evolving relationship, the intention is provide some critical balance and coherence to a contentious not to say often divisive aspect of research ethics in the securitised university.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 93
页数:20
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Agrell W(2012)The Next 100 Years? Reflections on the Future of Intelligence Intelligence and National Security 27 118-132
  • [2] Albert M(2011)Securitization, sectors and functional differentiation Security Dialogue 42 413-425
  • [3] Buzan B(2011)Securitization, sectors and functional differentiation Security Dialogue 42 413-425
  • [4] Albert M(2004)Security and the Democratic Scene, Desecuritisation and Emancipation Journal of International Relations and Development 7 388-413
  • [5] Buzan B(2000)In Defence of religion: Sacred referent objects for securitization Millennium: Journal for International Studies 29.3 705-739
  • [6] Aradau C(2002)Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease Alternatives 27 63-92
  • [7] Bagge Laustsen C(2010)European Union Security Governance: Putting the ‘security’ back in European Security 19 341-359
  • [8] Wæver O(1978)International Political Terrorism: A Challenge for Comparative Research International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 2 107-126
  • [9] Bigo D(2015)Education, Security and Intelligence Studies British Journal of Educational Studies 60 263-279
  • [10] Christou G(2018)Terrorism and counter-terrorism policy and research in UK universities (1997–2017): an analytic-structural review of the literature and related sources Policy Reviews in Higher Education 2 32-60