Case-Based Ethics Instruction: The Influence of Contextual and Individual Factors in Case Content on Ethical Decision-Making

被引:0
作者
Zhanna Bagdasarov
Chase E. Thiel
James F. Johnson
Shane Connelly
Lauren N. Harkrider
Lynn D. Devenport
Michael D. Mumford
机构
[1] University of Oklahoma,Department of Psychology
[2] Central Washington University,undefined
来源
Science and Engineering Ethics | 2013年 / 19卷
关键词
Case-based instruction; Ethical decision-making; Ethics cases; Teaching ethics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cases have been employed across multiple disciplines, including ethics education, as effective pedagogical tools. However, the benefit of case-based learning in the ethics domain varies across cases, suggesting that not all cases are equal in terms of pedagogical value. Indeed, case content appears to influence the extent to which cases promote learning and transfer. Consistent with this argument, the current study explored the influences of contextual and personal factors embedded in case content on ethical decision-making. Cases were manipulated to include a clear description of the social context and the goals of the characters involved. Results indicated that social context, specifically the description of an autonomy-supportive environment, facilitated execution of sensemaking processes and resulted in greater decision ethicality. Implications for designing optimal cases and case-based training programs are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1305 / 1322
页数:17
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Atkinson TN(2008)Using creative writing techniques to enhance the case study method in research integrity and ethics courses Journal of Academic Ethics 6 33-50
[2]  
Brock ME(2008)Mental models: An alternative evaluation of a sensemaking approach to ethics instruction Science and Engineering Ethics 14 449-472
[3]  
Vert A(1997)Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 69 117-132
[4]  
Kligyte V(2010)Consumer ethics: The role of self-regulatory focus Journal of Business Ethics 97 241-255
[5]  
Waples EP(1994)Positive affect improves creative problem solving and influences reported source of practice satisfaction in physicians Motivation and Emotion 18 1994-217
[6]  
Sevier ST(2007)Enhancing business ethics: Using cases to teach moral reasoning Journal of Business Ethics 79 213-632
[7]  
Mumford MD(2006)Regulatory focus and investment decisions in small groups Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 626-164
[8]  
Crowe E(2003)Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 90 148-156
[9]  
Higgins ET(2011)Bringing ethics into focus: How regulatory focus and risk preferences influence (Un)ethical behavior Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 115 145-898
[10]  
De Bock T(1987)Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 890-280