Optimal patent length and breadth in an economy with creative destruction and non-diversifiable risk

被引:0
作者
Tapio Palokangas
机构
[1] HECER,
[2] University of Helsinki,undefined
来源
Journal of Economics | 2011年 / 102卷
关键词
Patents; Imitation; Innovation; Product cycles; Non-diversifiable risk; L11; L16; O31; O34;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, I examine the optimal patent shape in an economy in which R&D firms innovate and imitate, households face non-diversifiable risk and there is externality in production and R&D. With non-diversifiable risk, a household’s consumption and investment decisions are interlinked. This economy contains industries of two kinds: monopoly industries with an innovator only, and duopoly industries with an innovator and an imitator. I define patent length as the expected time in which an innovation is imitated, and patent breadth as the innovator’s profit share in an industry after a successful imitation. The government can control patent length by the requirements for accepting a substitute for a patented good, and patent breadth by imposing compulsory licensing and royalties for the patentee after a successful imitation. I show that the stronger the externality in production relative to R&D is, the slower the optimal growth rate, the larger the optimal proportion of duopoly industries, and the longer and narrower the optimal patent.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 27
页数:26
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Aghion P(1997)Competition and growth with step-by-step innovation: an example Eur Econ Rev 41 771-782
  • [2] Harris C(2001)Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation Rev Econ Stud 68 467-492
  • [3] Vickers J(2009)Effects of blocking patents on R&D: a quantitative DGE analysis J Econ Growth 14 55-78
  • [4] Aghion P(2010)Effects of patent length on R&D: a quantitative DGE analysis J Econ 99 117-140
  • [5] Harris C(1996)Patent races and optimal width and length J Ind Econ 44 249-265
  • [6] Howitt P(1982)National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade Am Econ Rev 71 389-405
  • [7] Vickers J(2007)Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model J Econ Theory 132 306-334
  • [8] Chu AC(1993)Innovation, imitation and intellectual property rights Econometrica 61 1247-1280
  • [9] Chu AC(2007)Economic growth with imperfect protection of intellectual property rights J Econ 90 45-85
  • [10] Denicolo V(2003)Patent policy in an endogenous growth model J Econ 78 239-258