Specialty Choice Influences Medical Student Research and Productivity

被引:0
作者
Peacock J.G. [1 ]
Grande J.P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Graduate Medical Education, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, 3551 Roger Brook Dr., Fort Sam Houston, 78234, TX
[2] Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
关键词
Academic productivity; Competitive specialty; Medical education; Medical student research; Specialty choice;
D O I
10.1007/s40670-015-0117-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Medical student research is a critical component of undergraduate medical education, but few studies have looked at the impact of medical student research on career paths, including specialty choice. In this study, the authors surveyed current and former Mayo medical students regarding their research experiences before, during, and after medical school to determine the relationship of medical student research and specialty choice. Methods: The authors created a survey about medical student research using the “Google Forms” software in accordance with an IRB-approved protocol. They surveyed 1133 current and former Mayo Medical School students from the 1976–2014 graduating classes, receiving 374 responses (33 % response rate). Results: The authors grouped the respondents’ specialties into historically competitive specialties (Group 2), which had higher average USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores (higher than 240) and higher proportions of AOA members (higher than 20 %), and the remaining specialties (Group 1). Group 2 respondents had a significantly stronger pre-medical school interest in research and produced more medical school and graduate medical training publications and presentations than Group 1. Overall, students reported that their specialty choice had a stronger impact on their medical research than the impact of their research on their specialty choice. Conclusions: Historically competitive specialties tend to have more students interested in conducting and efficient in producing research during medical school and graduate medical training compared with other specialties. Students report that specialty choice significantly impacts medical student research and academic productivity. © 2015, International Association of Medical Science Educators.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Peacock J.G., Warner L.L., Drozdowicz L.B., Martin B.A., Suresh R., Denzer B.J., Et al., Curricular flexibility in the pre-clinical years promotes medical student scholarship, Med Sci Educ [Internet], 23, pp. 92-98, (2014)
[2]  
Bierer S.B., Chen H.C., How to measure success: the impact of scholarly concentrations on students—a literature review, Acad Med, 85, pp. 438-452, (2010)
[3]  
Chongsiriwatana K.M., Phelan S.T., Skipper B.J., Rhyne R.L., Rayburn W.F., Required research by medical students and their choice of a women’s health care residency, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 192, pp. 1478-1480
[4]  
Campos-Outcalt D., Senf J., Watkins A.J., Bastacky S., The effects of medical school curricula, faculty role models, and biomedical research support on choice of generalist physician careers: A review and quality assessment of the literature, Acad Med, 70, pp. 611-619, (1995)
[5]  
Ebbert A., A retrospective evaluation of research in the medical curriculum, J Med Educ, 35, pp. 637-643, (1960)
[6]  
Legardeur B., Lopez A., Johnson W.D., Evaluation of short research experiences in cancer, J Cancer Educ [Internet], 8, pp. 265-268, (1993)
[7]  
Wagner R.F.M., PharmD BI. Medical student dermatology research in the United States, Dermatol Online J, 11, (2005)
[8]  
Rosenberg S.N., A survey of physicians who studied public health during medical school, Am J Prev Med [Internet], 14, pp. 184-188, (1998)
[9]  
Porter B.L., Grande J.P., Mayo Medical School, Acad Med, 85, (2010)
[10]  
Charting Outcomes in the Match: Characteristics of Applicants Who Matched to Their Preferred Specialty in the 2011 Main Residency Match, pp. 1-264, (2011)