Urgent intubation without neuromuscular blocking agents and the risk of tracheostomy

被引:0
作者
Jun Fujinaga
Etsuji Suzuki
Akira Kuriyama
Mutsuo Onodera
Hiroyuki Doi
机构
[1] Kurashiki Central Hospital,Emergency and Critical Care Center
[2] Okayama University,Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
[3] Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology
来源
Internal and Emergency Medicine | 2020年 / 15卷
关键词
Airway management; Emergency patients; Neuromuscular blocking agents; Tracheostomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Neuromuscular blocking agents play a significant role in improving the success rate for urgent intubation, although there is limited evidence about the effect on subsequent outcomes, such as the incidence of tracheostomy. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to examine the association between avoidance of neuromuscular blocking agents for urgent tracheal intubation and incidence of tracheostomy among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). The setting of this study was an eight-bed ICU at a tertiary-care hospital in Okayama, Japan. We included patients who underwent urgent tracheal intubation at the emergency department or the ICU and were admitted to the ICU between April 2013 and November 2017. We extracted data on methods and medications of intubation, predictors for difficult intubation, Cormack–Lehane grade, patient demographics, primary diagnoses, reintubation. We estimated odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for elective tracheostomy during the ICU stay using logistic regression models. Of 411 patients, 46 patients underwent intubation without neuromuscular blocking agents and 61 patients underwent tracheostomy. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients who avoided neuromuscular blocking agents had more than double the odds of tracheostomy (odds ratio 2.59, 95% confidence interval 1.06–6.34, p value = 0.04). When stratifying the subjects by risk status for tracheostomy, the association was more pronounced in high-risk group, while we observed less significant association in the low-risk group. Avoidance of neuromuscular blocking agents for urgent intubation increases the risk of tracheostomy among emergency patients, especially those who have a higher risk for tracheostomy.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 134
页数:7
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Sakles JC(1998)Airway management in the emergency department: a 1-year study of 610 tracheal intubations Ann Emerg Med 31 325-332
[2]  
Laurin EG(2018)Effects of avoidance or use of neuromuscular blocking agents on outcomes in tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review Br J Anaesth 120 1381-1393
[3]  
Rantapaa AA(2017)The effectiveness of rapid sequence intubation (RSI) versus non-RSI in emergency department: an analysis of multicenter prospective observational study Int J Emerg Med. 10 1-2533
[4]  
Panacek EA(2012)Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition JAMA 307 2526-710
[5]  
Lundstrøm LH(1996)The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure: On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Intensive Care Med. 22 707-196
[6]  
Duez CHV(1974)THE INJURY SEVERITY SCORE The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care 14 187-786
[7]  
Nørskov AK(2015)Multiple failed intubation attempts are associated with decreased success rates on the first rescue intubation in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis of multicentre observational data Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 23 5-1111
[8]  
Okubo M(2015)Repeated attempts at tracheal intubation by a single intubator associated with decreased success rates in emergency departments: an analysis of a multicentre prospective observational study Emerg Med J 32 781-9
[9]  
Gibo K(1984)Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics Anaesthesia 39 1105-115
[10]  
Hagiwara Y(2013)Predictive risk index and prognosis of postoperative reintubation after planned extubation during general anesthesia: a single-center retrospective case-controlled study in Taiwan from 2005 to 2009 Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 51 3-534