the european political science agenda: a multilevel analysis from a country perspective

被引:0
作者
marcelo camerlo
david doyle
fátima garcía diez
leiv marsteintredet
机构
[1] University of Lisbon,Institute of Social Sciences
[2] University of Oxford,Department of Politics and International Relations
[3] University of Salamanca,undefined
[4] University of Bergen,undefined
来源
European Political Science | 2018年 / 17卷
关键词
political science; Ireland; Norway; Portugal; Spain;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This presentation introduces the analytical framework applied in this symposium for the analysis of publishing trends of European political scientists. Our goal is to ascertain the degree to which the discipline in four contrasting countries (Ireland, Norway, Portugal and Spain) speaks to a wider European or international audience. Is political science insular in these countries, or is it internationalised? On which aspects are the publications similar at the domestic, European and international levels, and on which do they differ? What dynamics have affected publishing habits over time? Is it possible to observe a process of convergence or divergence across levels over time? To face these questions, we set up a cross-national research team composed of graduate students and professors from the four countries, and created a common dataset that collected information on articles published in the highest ranked national, European and international journals between 1999 and 2014. The findings suggest that political science research in these countries has been running in two separate worlds: the domestic and the foreign levels. Also, the analyses point to a divergence between north and south regarding the predominant fields, topics and the interest for Europe, and institutional concentration.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Altman D(2012)Where is knowledge generated? On the productivity and impact of political science departments in Latin America European Political Science 11 71-87
[2]  
Billordo L(2005)Publishing in French political science journals: an inventory of methods and sub-fields French Politics 3 178-186
[3]  
Boncourt T(2007)The evolution of political science in France and Britain: a comparative study of two political science journals European Political Science 6 276-294
[4]  
Boncourt T(2008)Is European political science different from European political sciences? A comparative study of the European journal of political research, political studies and the revue Française de science politique 1973–2002 European Political Science 7 366-381
[5]  
Cancela J(2014)Mapping political research in Portugal: Scientific articles in national academic journals (2000–2012) European Political Science 13 327-339
[6]  
Coelho TD(2010)Good but not enough: Recent developments of political science in Italy European Political Science 9 102-116
[7]  
Ruivo JP(1999)Ranking the presses: political scientists evaluations of publisher quality PS: Political Science and Politics 32 257-262
[8]  
Capano G(2004)A global ranking of political science departments Political Studies Review 2 293-313
[9]  
Verzichelli L(2008)Increasing co-operation among Political Science Associations in Europe European Political Science 7 352-365
[10]  
Goodman LP(2007)Debating the direction of comparative politics: An analysis of leading journals Comparative Political Studies 40 5-31