Scenario-Based Hierarchical and Distributed MPC for Water Resources Management with Dynamical Uncertainty

被引:0
|
作者
P. Velarde
X. Tian
A. D. Sadowska
J. M. Maestre
机构
[1] Universidad UTE,Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería e Industrias
[2] University of Seville,System Engineering and Automation Department, School of Engineering
[3] Delft University of Technology,Department of Water Management
[4] Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology,College of Hydrometeorology
[5] Schlumberger Cambridge Research,undefined
来源
关键词
Water resource management; Model predictive control; Distributed control; Dynamical uncertainty; Hierarchical control;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A real-time control scheme informed by a streamflow forecast is presented for the optimal operation of water resources systems composed of multiple and spatially distributed systems, affected by hydroclimatic disturbances. The approach uses a two-layer scenario-based hierarchical and distributed model predictive controller (HD-MPC) to deal with the operational water management problem under dynamical uncertainty. The higher layer collects and coordinates forecast information, which is rendered into possible realizations of the uncertainties and sent to the local agents. The lower layer solves a distributed optimization problem related to the actual management objectives. The HD-MPC method is demonstrated through a simulation of the North Sea Canal system as a real-world case study. The results show the benefits of the proposed compared to over other types of MPC controllers.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 696
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Scenario-based Task Executor for IT Resource Management
    Ichikawa, Yujiro
    Komoda, Norihisa
    PROCEEDINGS 2016 5TH IIAI INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ADVANCED APPLIED INFORMATICS IIAI-AAI 2016, 2016, : 888 - 893
  • [42] SCENARIO-BASED RISK MANAGEMENT FOR ARCTIC WATERS
    Bergstrom, Martin
    Browne, Thomas
    Ehlers, Soren
    Helle, Inari
    Herrnring, Hauke
    Khan, Faisal
    Kubiczek, Jan
    Kujala, Pentti
    Korgesaar, Mihkel
    Leira, Bernt Johan
    Parviainen, Tuuli
    Polojarvi, Arttu
    Suominen, Mikko
    Taylor, Rocky
    Tuhkuri, Jukka
    Vanhatalo, Jarno
    Veitch, Brian
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 41ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE & ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2022, VOL 6, 2022,
  • [43] Decentralized scenario-based plug and play MPC for linear systems with multiplicative uncertainties
    Nehring, Anna
    Zhang, Ping
    13TH EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON ADVANCED CONTROL AND DIAGNOSIS (ACD 2016), 2017, 783
  • [44] Scenario-based stochastic MPC for vehicle speed control considering the interaction with pedestrians
    Anh-Tuan Tran
    Muraleedharan, Arun
    Okuda, Hiroyuki
    Suzuki, Tatsuya
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2020, 53 (02): : 15325 - 15331
  • [45] Scenario-based fitted Q-iteration for adaptive of water reservoir system under uncertainty
    Bertoni, Federica
    Giuliani, Matteo
    Castelletti, Andrea
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01): : 3183 - 3188
  • [46] A solution to the water resources crisis in wetlands: Development of a scenario-based modeling approach with uncertain features
    Lv, Ying
    Huang, Guohe
    Sun, Wei
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 442 : 515 - 526
  • [47] Scenario-based approach for flexible resource loading under uncertainty
    Wullink, G
    Gademann, AJRM
    Hans, EW
    Van Harten, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2004, 42 (24) : 5079 - 5098
  • [48] A solution to the water resources crisis in wetlands: Development of a scenario-based modeling approach with uncertain features
    Lv, Ying
    Huang, Guohe
    Sun, Wei
    Science of the Total Environment, 2013, 442 : 515 - 526
  • [49] JUST-IN-TIME SCHEDULING UNDER SCENARIO-BASED UNCERTAINTY
    Chung, Dae-Young
    Choi, Byung-Cheon
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 30 (02)
  • [50] A Scenario-Based Approach for Operating Theater Scheduling Under Uncertainty
    Freeman, Nickolas K.
    Melouk, Sharif H.
    Mittenthal, John
    M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 18 (02) : 245 - 261