Caring in the in-between: a proposal to introduce responsible AI and robotics to healthcare

被引:0
作者
Núria Vallès-Peris
Miquel Domènech
机构
[1] Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,Barcelona Science and Technology Studies Group (STS
来源
AI & SOCIETY | 2023年 / 38卷
关键词
Ethics of care; Science and technology studies; Robot embedded in a network (REN); Measured action; Care robots;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the scenario of growing polarization of promises and dangers that surround artificial intelligence (AI), how to introduce responsible AI and robotics in healthcare? In this paper, we develop an ethical–political approach to introduce democratic mechanisms to technological development, what we call “Caring in the In-Between”. Focusing on the multiple possibilities for action that emerge in the realm of uncertainty, we propose an ethical and responsible framework focused on care actions in between fears and hopes. Using the theoretical perspective of Science and Technology Studies and empirical research, “Caring in the In-Between” is based on three movements: the first is a change of focus from the world of promises and dangers to the world of uncertainties; the second is a conceptual shift from assuming a relationship with robotics based on a Human–Robot Interaction to another focused on the network in which the robot is embedded (the “Robot Embedded in a Network”); and the last is an ethical shift from a general normative framework to a discussion on the context of use. Based on these suggestions, “Caring in the In-Between” implies institutional challenges, as well as new practices in healthcare systems. It is articulated around three simultaneous processes, each of them related to practical actions in the “in-between” dimensions considered: monitoring relations and caring processes, through public engagement and institutional changes; including concerns and priorities of stakeholders, with the organization of participatory processes and alternative forms of representation; and making fears and hopes commensurable, through the choice of progressive and reversible actions.
引用
收藏
页码:1685 / 1695
页数:10
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Bijker WE(2009)How is technology made? That is the question! Camb J Econ 34 63-76
[2]  
Boada Pareto J(2021)The ethical issues of social assistive robotics: a critical literature review Technol Soc 67 101726-618
[3]  
Román Maestre B(2013)Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism Int J Soc Robot 5 593-89
[4]  
Torras Genís C(2005)Children and the feminist ethics of care Childhood 12 71-65
[5]  
Cabibihan JJ(2016)A survey of expectations about the role of robots in robot-assisted therapy for children with ASD: ethical acceptability, trust, sociability, appearance, and attachment Sci Eng Ethics 22 47-67
[6]  
Javed H(2016)Towards long-term social child-robot interaction: using multi-activity switching to engage young users J Hum Robot Interact 5 32-56
[7]  
Ang M(2018)The influence of a socially assistive robot on mood, anxiety, and arousal in children Prof Psychol Res Pract 49 48-291
[8]  
Aljunied SM(2016)Robots and humans-complements or substitutes? J Macroecon 49 280-437
[9]  
Cockburn T(1995)The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials Sci Technol Human Values 20 408-31
[10]  
Coeckelbergh M(2011)Ethical issues related to technology Robot Autom Mag 18 24-206