Effects of proactive interference on non-verbal working memory

被引:0
|
作者
Marilyn Cyr
Derek E. Nee
Eric Nelson
Thea Senger
John Jonides
Chara Malapani
机构
[1] New York State Psychiatric Institute,Division of Cognitive Neuroscience
[2] Florida State University,Department of Psychology
[3] University of Michigan,Department of Psychology
[4] Columbia University,Department of Psychiatry
来源
Cognitive Processing | 2017年 / 18卷
关键词
Interference/inhibition in memory retrieval; Working memory; Directed forgetting; Object recognition; Recollection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Working memory (WM) is a cognitive system responsible for actively maintaining and processing relevant information and is central to successful cognition. A process critical to WM is the resolution of proactive interference (PI), which involves suppressing memory intrusions from prior memories that are no longer relevant. Most studies that have examined resistance to PI in a process-pure fashion used verbal material. By contrast, studies using non-verbal material are scarce, and it remains unclear whether the effect of PI is domain-general or whether it applies solely to the verbal domain. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of PI in visual WM using both objects with high and low nameability. Using a Directed-Forgetting paradigm, we varied discriminability between WM items on two dimensions, one verbal (high-nameability vs. low-nameability objects) and one perceptual (colored vs. gray objects). As in previous studies using verbal material, effects of PI were found with object stimuli, even after controlling for verbal labels being used (i.e., low-nameability condition). We also found that the addition of distinctive features (color, verbal label) increased performance in rejecting intrusion probes, most likely through an increase in discriminability between content–context bindings in WM.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The influence of long-term memory on working memory: Age-differences in proactive facilitation and interference
    Rhodes, Stephen
    Buchsbaum, Bradley R.
    Hasher, Lynn
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2022, 29 (01) : 191 - 202
  • [42] Neural Underpinnings of Proactive Interference in Working Memory: Evidence From Patients With Unilateral Lesions
    Ries, Stephanie K.
    Schendel, Krista L.
    Herron, Timothy J.
    Dronkers, Nina F.
    Baldo, Juliana V.
    Turken, And U.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [43] Tracking Proactive Interference in Visual Memory
    Mercer, Tom
    Jarvis, Ruby-Jane
    Lawton, Rebekah
    Walters, Frankie
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [44] Visuospatial and verbal working memory load: effects on visuospatial vigilance
    William S. Helton
    Paul N. Russell
    Experimental Brain Research, 2013, 224 : 429 - 436
  • [45] Visuospatial and verbal working memory load: effects on visuospatial vigilance
    Helton, William S.
    Russell, Paul N.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2013, 224 (03) : 429 - 436
  • [46] From Learning to Memory: A Comparison Between Verbal and Non-verbal Skills in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
    Maeder, Johanna
    Bostelmann, Mathilde
    Schneider, Maude
    Bortolin, Karin
    Kliegel, Matthias
    Eliez, Stephan
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 12
  • [47] Emotion processing effects on interference resolution in working memory
    Levens, Sara A.
    Phelps, Elizabeth A.
    EMOTION, 2008, 8 (02) : 267 - 280
  • [48] Spatial Sequences, but Not Verbal Sequences, Are Vulnerable to General Interference During Retention in Working Memory
    Morey, Candice C.
    Miron, Monica D.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2016, 42 (12) : 1907 - 1918
  • [49] Hebb repetition effects for non-verbal visual sequences: determinants of sequence acquisition
    Johnson, Andrew J.
    Dygacz, Artur
    Miles, Christopher
    MEMORY, 2017, 25 (09) : 1279 - 1293
  • [50] Directed forgetting instructions decrease proactive interference within working memory below that of a baseline encode-only condition
    Festini, Sara B.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 32 (08) : 734 - 746