In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments

被引:85
作者
Van Laer S. [1 ]
Elen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Education and Training, Centre for Instructional Psychology and Technology, KU Leuven, Dekenstraat 2 (box 3773), Leuven
关键词
Blended learning; Instructional design; Self-regulation; Support; Systematic review;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-016-9505-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Blended forms of learning have become increasingly popular. Learning activities within these environments are supported by a large variety of online and face-to-face interventions. However, it remains unclear whether these blended environments are successful, and if they are, what makes them successful. Studies suggest that blended learning challenges the self-regulatory abilities of learners, though the literature does little to explain these findings; nor does it provide solutions. In particular, little is known about the attributes that are essential to support learners and how they should guide course design. To identify such attributes and enable a more thoughtful redesign of blended learning environments, this systematic literature review (n = 95) examines evidence published between 1985 and 2015 on attributes of blended learning environments that support self-regulation. The purpose of this review is therefore to identify and define the attributes of blended learning environments that support learners’ self-regulatory abilities. Seven key attributes were found (authenticity, personalization, learner-control, scaffolding, interaction, cues for reflection and cues for calibration). This review is the first to identify and define the attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments and thus to support the design of blended learning environments. This study may serve to facilitate the design of blended learning environments that meet learners’ self-regulatory needs. It also raises crucial questions about how blended learning relates to well-established learning theories and provides a basis for future research on self-regulation in blended learning environments. © 2016, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:1395 / 1454
页数:59
相关论文
共 206 条
[71]  
Ho C., Swan K., Evaluating online conversation in an asynchronous learning environment: an application of Grice’s cooperative principle, The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 1, pp. 3-14, (2007)
[72]  
Hodges C.B., Murphy P.F., Sources of self-efficacy beliefs of students in a technology-intensive asynchronous college algebra course, The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 2, pp. 93-97, (2009)
[73]  
House R., Clocking in column, The Spokesman-Review, (2002)
[74]  
Hughes M.G., Day E.A., Wang X., Schuelke M.J., Arsenault M.L., Harkrider L.N., Cooper O.D., Learner-controlled practice difficulty in the training of a complex task: cognitive and motivational mechanisms, Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 1, pp. 80-98, (2013)
[75]  
Hung H.-L., Hyun E., East Asian international graduate students’ epistemological experiences in an American University, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 4, pp. 340-353, (2010)
[76]  
Hung S.-Y., Huang K.-L., Yu W.-J., An empirical study of the effectiveness of multimedia disclosure of informed consent: a technology mediated learning perspective, Information & Management, 48, 4-5, pp. 135-144, (2011)
[77]  
Ibabe I., Jauregizar J., Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge, Higher Education, 59, 2, pp. 243-258, (2010)
[78]  
Learninginstructionthe digital age: Springer, (2010)
[79]  
Ioannou A., Brown S.W., Artino A.R., Wikis and forums for collaborative problem-based activity: a systematic comparison of learners’ interactions, The Internet and Higher Education, 24, pp. 35-45, (2015)
[80]  
Jonas D., Burns B., The transition to blended e-learning. changing the focus of educational delivery in children’s pain management, Nurse Education in Practice, 10, 1, pp. 1-7, (2010)