Preserving a Place for Interpretive Work in Canadian Sociology: a Reflection on Dorothy Pawluch’s Contributions

被引:0
作者
Kathleen Steeves
机构
[1] Trinity Western University,
来源
The American Sociologist | 2022年 / 53卷
关键词
Canadian sociology; Symbolic interactionism; Interpretive tradition; Mentorship;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In plotting the course for the discipline of sociology, sociologists over the past two decades have called for the practice of “public sociology” (Burawoy in American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28, 2005), for disciplinary convergence around a critical methodology (Carroll in Canadian Review of Sociology, 50(1), 1–26, 2013) and the devotion of our scholarly efforts to issues of social justice (Romero in American Sociological Review,85(1), 1–30, 2020). While public, critical, and social justice-oriented work is important, these disciplinary mandates can serve to marginalize other types of sociological work that are valuable as well. In this climate, work coming from perspectives that are not as left leaning politically, or that does not seek to advance any political agenda may be seen as less valued or legitimate, and scholars who choose to separate their political agendas from their research may experience marginalization (McLaughlin in Canadian Journal of Sociology, 30(1), 1–40, 2005; Pawluch in The American Sociologist,50, 204–219, 2019). Inspired by the work and doctoral mentorship of Dorothy Pawluch, this paper seeks to both understand the historical development of the field of Canadian sociology and consider the value and place of the interpretive tradition within it. Through reflecting on the research of others and my own experiences as a graduate student, I argue that the “chilly” climate Dorothy (Pawluch in The American Sociologist,50, 204–219, 2019) alludes to for scholars who operate outside of a politically informed “social-justice agenda” does exist, but that mentorship can help mediate this chill for interpretive leaning students. Finally, I suggest that the branch of the interpretive tradition which asks researchers to suspend their own perspectives and privilege the position of others still has value for Canadian sociology. It can both produce deep, meaningful research contributions and provide students with tools for engaging in productive intellectual debate and transformative encounters with difference.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 204
页数:16
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Burawoy M(2005)2004 ASA presidential address: For public sociology American Sociological Review 70 4-28
  • [2] Pawluch D(2019)On the unbearable lightness of being a constructionist The American Sociologist 50 204-219
  • [3] Puddephatt AJ(2006)Unveiling the cloak of competence: Cultivating authenticity in graduate sociology The American Sociologist 37 84-98
  • [4] Kelly BW(2017)Experiencing a call to ministry: Changing trajectories, re-structuring life stories Qualitative Sociology Review 13 48-68
  • [5] Adorjan M(2019)The more American sociology seeks to become a politically-relevant discipline, the more irrelevant it becomes to solving societal problems The American Sociologist 50 456-487
  • [6] Steeves K(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [7] Turner JH(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined