Ovarian and tubal torsion: Imaging findings on US, CT, and MRI

被引:87
作者
Lourenco A.P. [1 ]
Swenson D. [1 ]
Tubbs R.J. [2 ]
Lazarus E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903
[2] Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence
关键词
Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ovarian torsion; Pelvic pain; Ultrasound;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-013-1163-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accurate diagnosis of adnexal torsion is often challenging, as clinical presentation is nonspecific and the differential for pelvic pain is broad. However, prompt diagnosis and treatment is critical to good clinical outcomes and preservation of the ovary and/or fallopian tube. Ultrasound (US) imaging is most frequently used to assess torsion. However, as computed tomography (CT) utilization in the emergency setting has increased, there are times when CT is the initial imaging test. Additionally, the nonspecific clinical presentation may initially be interpreted as gastrointestinal in etiology, where CT is the preferred exam. For these reasons, it is imperative to know the findings of adnexal torsion on CT as well as US. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful in cases where the diagnosis remains unclear and is particularly helpful in the young or pregnant patient with equivocal sonographic findings, as it provides excellent soft tissue contrast without ionizing radiation. This article will illustrate the findings of surgically confirmed ovarian and fallopian tube torsion on US, CT, and MRI, including those in the pregnant patient. Ovarian enlargement, adnexal mass, twisting of the vascular pedicle, edematous and heterogeneous appearance of the ovary, peripheral ovarian follicles, free fluid, uterine deviation towards the side of torsion, adnexal fat stranding, tubal dilatation, and decreased adnexal enhancement will be reviewed. Familiarity with the range of imaging findings across multiple modalities is key to improving the likelihood of timely diagnosis and therefore improved clinical outcomes. © 2013 Am Soc Emergency Radiol.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 187
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Houry D., Abbott J.T., Ovarian torsion: A fifteen-year review, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 38, 2, pp. 156-159, (2001)
  • [2] Pinto A.B., Ratts V.S., Williams D.B., Keller S.L., Odem R.R., Reduction of ovarian torsion 1 week after embryo transfer in a patient with bilateral hyperstimulated ovaries, Fertility and Sterility, 76, 2, pp. 403-406, (2001)
  • [3] Gittleman A.M., Price A.P., Goffner L., Katz D.S., Ovarian torsion: CT findings in a child, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 39, 8, pp. 1270-1272, (2004)
  • [4] Chiou S.-Y., Lev-Toaff A.S., Masuda E., Feld R.I., Bergin D., Adnexal torsion: New clinical and imaging observations by sonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 26, 10, pp. 1289-1301, (2007)
  • [5] Moore C., Meyers A.B., Capotasto J., Bokhari J., Prevalence of abnormal CT findings in patients with proven ovarian torsion and a proposed triage schema, Emerg Radiol, 16, pp. 115-120, (2009)
  • [6] Hiller N., Appelbaum L., Simanovsky N., Lev-Sagi A., Aharoni D., Sella T., CT features of adnexal torsion, American Journal of Roentgenology, 189, 1, pp. 124-129, (2007)
  • [7] Standring S., Gray's Anatomy, (2008)
  • [8] Chinchure D., Ong C.L., Loh A.H., Rajadurai V.S., Neonatal ovarian cysts: Role of sonography in diagnosing torsion, Ann Acad Med Singap, 40, pp. 291-295, (2011)
  • [9] Celik A., Ergun O., Aldemir H., Ozcan C., Ozok G., Erdener A., Et al., Long-term results of conservative management of adnexal torsion in children, J Pediatr Surg, 40, pp. 704-708, (2005)
  • [10] Germain M.M., Rarick T., Robins E., Management of intermittent ovarian torsion by laparoscopic oophoropexy, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 88, 4 II SUPPL., pp. 715-717, (1996)