Multimodal emotion classification using machine learning in immersive and non-immersive virtual reality

被引:2
作者
Lima, Rodrigo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chirico, Alice [4 ]
Varandas, Rui [6 ,7 ]
Gamboa, Hugo [6 ,7 ]
Gaggioli, Andrea [4 ,5 ]
Badia, Sergi Bermudez [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Madeira, Fac Ciencias Exatas & Engn, Campus Univ Penteada, P-9000105 Funchal, Portugal
[2] Univ Nova Lisboa, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, NOVA Lab Comp Sci & Informat, P-2829516 Caparica, Portugal
[3] Agencia Reg Desenvolvimento Invest Tecnol & Inovac, Caminho Penteada, P-9020105 Funchal, Portugal
[4] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento Psicol, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, I-20123 Milan, Italy
[5] Ist Auxol Italiano, IRCCS, Appl Technol Neuropsychol Lab, I-20149 Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Nova Lisboa, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, Lab Instrumentat Biomed Engn & Radiat Phys, LIBPhys, P-2829516 Setubal, Portugal
[7] PLUX Wireless Biosignals SA, Ave 5 Outubro 70, P-1050059 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Affective computing; Emotions; Wearables; Physiological signals; Machine learning; Virtual reality; RECOGNITION; APPRAISAL; DATABASE; VALENCE; STRESS;
D O I
10.1007/s10055-024-00989-y
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Affective computing has been widely used to detect and recognize emotional states. The main goal of this study was to detect emotional states using machine learning algorithms automatically. The experimental procedure involved eliciting emotional states using film clips in an immersive and non-immersive virtual reality setup. The participants' physiological signals were recorded and analyzed to train machine learning models to recognize users' emotional states. Furthermore, two subjective ratings emotional scales were provided to rate each emotional film clip. Results showed no significant differences between presenting the stimuli in the two degrees of immersion. Regarding emotion classification, it emerged that for both physiological signals and subjective ratings, user-dependent models have a better performance when compared to user-independent models. We obtained an average accuracy of 69.29 +/- 11.41% and 71.00 +/- 7.95% for the subjective ratings and physiological signals, respectively. On the other hand, using user-independent models, the accuracy we obtained was 54.0 +/- 17.2% and 24.9 +/- 4.0%, respectively. We interpreted these data as the result of high inter-subject variability among participants, suggesting the need for user-dependent classification models. In future works, we intend to develop new classification algorithms and transfer them to real-time implementation. This will make it possible to adapt to a virtual reality environment in real-time, according to the user's emotional state.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Achlioptas P, 2021, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2101.07396, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2101.07396]
[2]   First evidence for differential and sequential efferent effects of stimulus relevance and goal conduciveness appraisal [J].
Aue, Tatjana ;
Flykt, Anders ;
Scherer, Klaus R. .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 74 (03) :347-357
[3]   Emotion regulation and mental health: recent findings, current challenges, and future directions [J].
Berking, Matthias ;
Wupperman, Peggilee .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 25 (02) :128-134
[4]   How Reliable Are Ultra-Short-Term HRV Measurements during Cognitively Demanding Tasks? [J].
Bernardes, Andre ;
Couceiro, Ricardo ;
Medeiros, Julio ;
Henriques, Jorge ;
Teixeira, Cesar ;
Simoes, Marco ;
Duraes, Joao ;
Barbosa, Raul ;
Madeira, Henrique ;
Carvalho, Paulo .
SENSORS, 2022, 22 (17)
[5]   The Affective Slider: A Digital Self-Assessment Scale for the Measurement of Human Emotions [J].
Betella, Alberto ;
Verschure, Paul F. M. J. .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02)
[6]   Feasibility of a walking virtual reality system for rehabilitation: objective and subjective parameters [J].
Borrego, Adrin ;
Latorre, Jorge ;
Llorens, Roberto ;
Alcaniz, Mariano ;
Noe, Enrique .
JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2016, 13
[7]   A Review, Current Challenges, and Future Possibilities on Emotion Recognition Using Machine Learning and Physiological Signals [J].
Bota, Patricia J. ;
Wang, Chen ;
Fred, Ana L. N. ;
da Silva, Hugo Placido .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :140990-141020
[8]  
Boucsein W, 2012, ELECTRODERMAL ACTIVITY, SECOND EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-1126-0
[9]   MEASURING EMOTION - THE SELF-ASSESSMENT MANNEQUIN AND THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL [J].
BRADLEY, MM ;
LANG, PJ .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 25 (01) :49-59
[10]   INFERRING PSYCHOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE FROM PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNALS [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
TASSINARY, LG .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1990, 45 (01) :16-28