The Senhance Surgical System in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review

被引:0
作者
Tyler McKechnie
Jigish Khamar
Ryan Daniel
Yung Lee
Lily Park
Aristithes G. Doumouras
Dennis Hong
Mohit Bhandari
Cagla Eskicioglu
机构
[1] McMaster University,Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery
[2] McMaster University,Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine
[3] University of Toronto,Temerty Faculty of Medicine
[4] McMaster University. St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton,Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery
来源
Journal of Robotic Surgery | 2023年 / 17卷
关键词
Robotic surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Colorectal surgery; Colectomy; Senhance Surgical System;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Senhance Surgical System allows for infrared eye tracking, haptic feedback, and an adjustable upright seat allowing for improved ergonomics. This systematic review was designed with the aim of reviewing the current literature pertaining to the use of the Senhance Surgical System in colorectal surgery. Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated adults undergoing colorectal surgery with the Senhance Surgical System. The primary outcome was intraoperative efficacy; as defined by operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and conversion. A DerSimonian and Laird inverse variance random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate overall effect size estimates and narrative review was provided for each outcome. Six observational studies with 223 patients (mean age: 63.7, 41.2% female, mean BMI: 24.4 kg/m2) were included. The most common indication for surgery was colorectal cancer (n = 180, 80.7%) and the most common operation was anterior resection (n = 72, 32.3%). Meta-analyses demonstrated a pooled total operative time of 229.8 min (95% CI 189.3–270.4, I2 = 0%), console time of 141.3 min (95% CI 106.5–176.1, I2 = 0%), and docking time of 10.8 min (95% CI 6.4–15.2, I2 = 0%). The pooled EBL was 37.0 mL (95% CI 24.7–49.2, I2 = 20%). Overall, there were nine (4.0%) conversions to laparoscopy/laparotomy. The Senhance Surgical System has an acceptable safety profile, reasonable docking and console times, low conversion rates, and an affordable case cost across a variety of colorectal surgeries. Further prospective, comparative trials with other robotic surgical platforms are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 334
页数:9
相关论文
共 134 条
  • [1] Jacobs M(1991)Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy) Surg Laparosc Endosc 1 144-150
  • [2] Verdeja JC(2004)A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer N Engl J Med 350 2050-2059
  • [3] Goldstein HS(2007)Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial Ann Surg 246 655-664
  • [4] Nelson H(2007)Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for stage II or III left-sided colon cancers: a randomized controlled trial Ann Surg Oncol 14 109-117
  • [5] Sargent DJ(2005)Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial The Lancet (British edition) 365 1718-1726
  • [6] Wieand HS(2008)The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer Ann Surg 248 1-7
  • [7] Fleshman J(1995)Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy : the learning curve Surg Endosc 9 1179-1183
  • [8] Sargent DJ(2002)The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12 1-5
  • [9] Green E(2009)Emerging role of laparoscopic and robotic surgery for rectal cancers Ann Surg Oncol 16 1451-1453
  • [10] Liang JT(2012)Robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review ISRN Surg 2012 1-12