Relationship between energy, investment, human capital, environment, and economic growth in four BRICS countries

被引:0
作者
Muhammad Azam
机构
[1] Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan,Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2019年 / 26卷
关键词
Energy consumption; Environmental pollution; Human capital; FDI; Panel data; BRICS-4; O4; Q5; F2; E5; C23;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study empirically evaluates the impact of energy, environmental pollution, human capital, financial development, and physical capital on economic growth in countries like Brazil, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS-4) from 1981 to 2015. Relevant diagnostic tests, the Panel Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (F.M.O.L.S.), Robust Least Squares (R.L.S.) methods, and the Dumitrescu-Hurlin Panel causality test are implemented for empirical investigation. The key outcomes from the F.M.O.L.S. and R.L.S. methods indicate that energy consumption, physical capital, human capital, and financial development contribute to economic growth, while environmental pollution attenuates economic growth. Moreover, the Dumitrescu-Hurlin Panel causality test results reveal about the bidirectional and unidirectional causality between energy consumption, environmental pollution, investment, human capital, and financial sector expansion and growth. Thus, based on the findings, this study recommend that the BRICS countries’ policy makers need to formulate public policy to ensure adequate energy supply, enhance foreign investments, improve health sector, develop financial sector, and regulate environmental pollution to achieve sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页码:34388 / 34400
页数:12
相关论文
共 165 条
[1]  
Abdouli M(2017)Exploring links between FDI inflows, energy consumption, and economic growth: further evidence from MENA countries J Econ Dev 42 95-117
[2]  
Hammami S(2015)Foreign direct investment, financial development, international trade and energy consumption: panel data evidence from selected ASEAN countries Int J Energy Econ Policy 5 841-850
[3]  
Abidin ISZ(2019)Analyzing the impact of energy, export variety, and FDI on environmental degradation in the context of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a case study of India Energies 12 1076-203
[4]  
Haseeb M(2013)Financial development and economic growth in Ghana: does the measure of financial development matter? Rev Dev Financ 3 192-374
[5]  
Azam M(2018)Causal linkages between energy investment and economic growth: a panel data modelling analysis of China Energy Sourc B 13 363-678
[6]  
Islam R(2016)Causal nexus between energy consumption and economic growth for high, middle and low income countries using frequency domain analysis Renew Sust Energ Rev 60 653-1000
[7]  
Adamu TM(2017)Re-visiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Malaysia: fresh evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach Renew Sust Energ Rev 77 990-278
[8]  
Haq I(2008)Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption in Malaysia J Policy Model 30 271-705
[9]  
Shafiq M(2015)The role of migrant workers remittances in fostering economic growth International Journal of Social Economics 42 690-182
[10]  
Adu G(2016)Does environmental degradation shackle economic growth? A panel data investigation on 11 Asian countries Renew Sust Energ Rev 65 175-111