Misconceptions About Sound Among Engineering Students

被引:0
作者
Arcadi Pejuan
Xavier Bohigas
Xavier Jaén
Cristina Periago
机构
[1] Technical University of Catalonia,Department of Physics and Nuclear Engineering
来源
Journal of Science Education and Technology | 2012年 / 21卷
关键词
Misconceptions; Mental models of sound; Sound propagation; Mental-model inconsistency; Engineering students;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Our first objective was to detect misconceptions about the microscopic nature of sound among senior university students enrolled in different engineering programmes (from chemistry to telecommunications). We sought to determine how these misconceptions are expressed (qualitative aspect) and, only very secondarily, to gain a general idea of the extent to which they are held (quantitative aspect). Our second objective was to explore other misconceptions about wave aspects of sound. We have also considered the degree of consistency in the model of sound used by each student. Forty students answered a questionnaire including open-ended questions. Based on their free, spontaneous answers, the main results were as follows: a large majority of students answered most of the questions regarding the microscopic model of sound according to the scientifically accepted model; however, only a small number answered consistently. The main model misconception found was the notion that sound is propagated through the travelling of air particles, even in solids. Misconceptions and mental-model inconsistencies tended to depend on the engineering programme in which the student was enrolled. However, students in general were inconsistent also in applying their model of sound to individual sound properties. The main conclusion is that our students have not truly internalised the scientifically accepted model that they have allegedly learnt. This implies a need to design learning activities that take these findings into account in order to be truly efficient.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 685
页数:16
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [1] Alonzo AC(2009)Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression Sci Educ 93 389-421
  • [2] Steedle JT(2010)A comparison of the effects of two physics laboratory applications with different approaches on student physics achievement Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B Soc Educ Stud 2 161-185
  • [3] Azar A(2006)The impact of science fiction film on student understanding of science J Sci Educ Technol 15 179-191
  • [4] Barnett M(2003)The teaching of science: content, coherence, and congruence J Sci Educ Technol 12 343-358
  • [5] Wagner H(2011)How did creating a constructivist learning environment influence my graduate students’ views? Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B Soc Educ Stud 3 1-13
  • [6] Gatling A(2005)A comparison of level of understanding of eighth-grade students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts J Res Sci Teach 42 638-667
  • [7] Anderson J(2005)A review of solution chemistry studies: insights into students’ conceptions J Sci Educ Technol 14 29-50
  • [8] Houle M(2010)Investigating the effectiveness of teaching methods based on a four-step constructivist strategy J Sci Educ Technol 19 32-48
  • [9] Kafka A(2010)The effect of conceptual change pedagogy on students’ conceptions of rate of reaction J Sci Educ Technol 19 422-433
  • [10] Bybee RW(2007)Investigating primary and secondary students’ learning of physics concepts in Taiwan Int J Sci Educ 29 465-482