TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
De-Ke Jiang
Lei Yao
Wei-Hua Ren
Wen-Zhang Wang
Bo Peng
Long Yu
机构
[1] Fudan University,The State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering
[2] Fudan University,Institute of Biomedical Science
来源
Medical Oncology | 2011年 / 28卷
关键词
Codon 72; Polymorphism; Endometrial cancer; Meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Studies investigating the relationship between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk reported conflicting results. To explore a more precise estimate of the effect of this polymorphism on endometrial carcinogenesis, a meta-analysis was performed by searching eligible studies in PubMed. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association for codominant model (Arg/Arg vs. Pro/Pro, Arg/Pro vs. Pro/Pro), dominant model (Arg/Arg + Arg/Pro vs. Pro/Pro), and recessive model (Arg/Arg vs. Arg/Pro + Pro/Pro), respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed by Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in controls, the specimen of cases for determining TP53 genotypes, sample size, the source of control and case groups, and ethnicity. We identified 8 case–control studies involving 2,154 subjects for this meta-analysis. Overall, no evidence of association was observed between TP53 genotypes and endometrial cancer risk in all genetic models (Arg/Arg vs. Pro/Pro: OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.69–1.39, P = 0.90; Arg/Pro vs. Pro/Pro: OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.71–1.42, P = 0.98; dominant model: OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.71–1.38, P = 0.95; recessive model: OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.80–1.41, P = 0.95). Stratified analyses also detected no significant association in any subgroup, except among those studies with controls deviated from HWE in recessive model (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.07–2.39). In conclusion, we did not observe any evidence for a role of TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism in endometrial cancer. The reported significant association between this polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk may be due to methodological errors such as selection bias, small sample size, Type I error, and population stratification.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1135
页数:6
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Linkov F(2008)Endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial cancer and prevention: gaps in existing research of modifiable risk factors Eur J Cancer 44 1632-1644
[2]  
Amant F(2005)Endometrial cancer Lancet 366 491-505
[3]  
Kaaks R(2002)Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11 1531-1543
[4]  
Lukanova A(2008)Obesity and gynaecological cancer Menopause Int 14 33-37
[5]  
Kurzer MS(2008)Hormonal carcinogenesis and socio-biological development factors in endometrial cancer: a clinical review Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87 1101-1113
[6]  
Lane G(2005)Single nucleotide polymorphism: a new risk factor for endometrial cancer? Future Oncol 1 323-330
[7]  
Tinelli A(2008)Genetic polymorphisms and endometrial cancer risk Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 8 1159-1167
[8]  
Kang S(2004)P53 is a tumor suppressor gene Cell 116 S67-S69
[9]  
Roh JW(2007)Shaping genetic alterations in human cancer: the p53 mutation paradigm Cancer Cell 12 303-312
[10]  
Kim JW(2009)p53 polymorphisms: cancer implications Nat Rev Cancer 9 95-107