Landslide vulnerability assessment based on entropy method: a case study from Kegalle district, Sri Lanka

被引:0
作者
E. N. C. Perera
D. T. Jayawardana
P. Jayasinghe
Manjula Ranagalage
机构
[1] University of Colombo,Institute of Human Resource Advancement (IHRA)
[2] University of Sri Jayewardenepura,Faculty of Graduate Studies
[3] University of Sri Jayewardenepura,Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, Faculty of Applied Science
[4] National Building Research Organization,Landslide Division
[5] University of Tsukuba,Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences
[6] Rajarata University of Sri Lanka,Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities
来源
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment | 2019年 / 5卷
关键词
Landslides; Entropy method; Interpolation; Vulnerability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The concept of landslide vulnerability to a given location is hard to quantify. Few studies have been carried to determine susceptibility using social and physical factors. This study is the first attempt in Sri Lanka to quantify level of vulnerability by integrating major physical and social indicators to map the spatial distribution of vulnerability. Considering the limitations of traditional weight evaluation method in calculation of the multiple indicators and ignorance of the associations among evaluating indicators, a new weight evaluation process, entropy method was introduced in this study. This improved method for determination of weight of the evaluating indicators was applied to estimate weight for the 14 selected indicators. The primary data were obtained from a comprehensive questioner survey (n = 402) of households or buildings (elements) with their coordinates based on a spatially balanced approach for ensuring spatial coverage of the entire landslide distribution. The spatial distribution of vulnerability was mapped using Kriging interpolation. According to the map, landslide vulnerabilities in the study area demonstrate notable regional specifications. Besides, the spatial distribution of vulnerability has shown a close relationship with rural and urban settlements. Results of spatial vulnerability reflect discrimination and inequalities in the development of the study area. According to landslide vulnerability analyses, 14.6% (247 km2) of the entire area is found to be the highest vulnerable zone for a landslide and 39.8% (675 km2) of area categorized under the lowest zone to vulnerability. Further, the study revealed a reasonable contribution by entropy method on analysis of social and physical indicators, which is useful for other vulnerability assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:1635 / 1649
页数:14
相关论文
共 165 条
[1]  
Aguilar BH(2016)The production of vulnerability to landslides: the risk habitus in two landslide-prone neighborhoods in Teziutlán InvestigationsGeográficas: Boletín del Instituto de Geografía 90 7-27
[2]  
Rivera NR(2017)Disaster risk reduction education in Indonesia: challenges and recommendations for scaling up Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 17 595-612
[3]  
Amri A(2011)Reducing landslide risk in communities, evidence from the Eastern Caribbean Appl Geogr 31 590-599
[4]  
Bird DK(2007)Risk and vulnerability indicators at a different scale: applicability usefulness and policy implication Environ Hazards 7 20-31
[5]  
Ronan K(2018)Displacement of a landslide retaining wall and application of an enhanced failure forecasting approach Landslides 15 489-505
[6]  
Haynes K(2016)Urban–rural differences in disaster resilience Ann Am Assoc Geogr 106 1236-1252
[7]  
Towers B(2002)Landslide risk assessment and management, an overview Eng Geol 64 65-87
[8]  
Anderson MG(2015)GIS-based assessment of vulnerability to landslide hazards in Lushan earthquake-stricken areas J Risk Anal Crisis Response 5 93-106
[9]  
Holcombe E(2018)Accessing the soil erosion rate based on RUSLE model for sustainable land use management: a case study of the Kotmale watershed, Sri Lanka Model Earth Syst Environ 4 1-16
[10]  
Blake JR(2015)The role of hazard vulnerability assessments in disaster preparedness and prevention in China Mil Med Res 2 27-34