European map of prevalence rates of elder abuse and its impact for future research

被引:0
作者
Liesbeth De Donder
Minna-Liisa Luoma
Bridget Penhale
Gert Lang
Ana J. Santos
Ilona Tamutiene
Mira Koivusilta
Anna Schopf
José Ferreira Alves
Jolanta Reingarde
Sirkka Perttu
Tiina Savola
Dominique Verté
机构
[1] Vrije Universiteit Brussel,Department of Educational Sciences
[2] National Institute for Welfare and Health (THL),Department of Living Conditions, Health and Wellbeing
[3] University of East Anglia,School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health
[4] Research Institute of the Red Cross,Department of Psychology (IEP)
[5] University of Minho,Sociology Department
[6] Vytautas Magnus University,Palmenia Centre for Continuing Education
[7] University of Helsinki,Palmenia Centre for Continuing Education
[8] University of Helsinki,undefined
来源
European Journal of Ageing | 2011年 / 8卷
关键词
Elder abuse; Violence; Neglect; Older people; Prevalence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article aims to map existing prevalence research on abuse and neglect of older people and to provide a critical overview of existing methodologies, which have been adopted to survey the prevalence rates of abuse against elders. This article is part of the prevalence study of Abuse and Violence against Older Women (AVOW) study, which was conducted in five European countries (Austria, Belgium, Finland, Lithuania, and Portugal). The article provides an overview of the state of the art of prevalence data, survey designs and methods, instruments and results in Europe. Therefore, this draws on an extensive literature search and qualitative content analysis, which was conducted as an early part of the AVOW study. Results indicate that some EU countries have a rich history of prevalence research, whereas other countries have just begun to tackle this aspect of research on of elder abuse. One of the lacunae concerns reliable numbers on the prevalence rates of elder abuse. Research about where, when and how often elder abuse occurs, is inadequate and inconsistent. Data in some cases are based on professionals’ reports rather than on information from older people themselves. Surveying elders about such a sensitive topic, however, implies the need for an adequate research instrument (questionnaire) and research design, and an adapted data collection method. In conclusion, substantial attention is paid to outlining possible guidelines for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 143
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Baker AA(1975)Granny battering Mod Geriatr 5 20-24
[2]  
Boyle MH(1998)Guidelines for evaluating prevalence studies Evid Based Ment Health 1 37-39
[3]  
Burston GR(1975)Granny battering Br Med J 3 592-74
[4]  
Carney MT(2003)Elder abuse: is every bruise a sign of abuse? Mt Sinai J Med 70 69-184
[5]  
Kahan FS(2010)Signs of elder abuse in the District of Viseu Psychol Health 25 178-888
[6]  
Paris BEC(1998)Elder abuse in the community: prevalence and consequences J Am Geriatr Soc 46 885-160
[7]  
*Chaves C(2008)The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review Age Ageing 37 151-313
[8]  
Ferreira-Alves J(1987)Elder abuse in the family context: a topic of research, practice and public information Z Gerontol 20 305-78
[9]  
Martins R(2007)Searching for elder abuse: a systematic review of database citations J Elder Abuse Negl 19 59-822
[10]  
Albuquerque C(2009)Prevalence and risk factors of suspected elder abuse subtypes in people aged 75 and older J Am Geriatr Soc 57 815-389